Implement `From<[T; N]>` for `Rc<[T]>` and `Arc<[T]>` by nvzqz...
source link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/114041
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.
Conversation
Contributor
Given that Box<[T]> already has this conversion, the shared counterparts should also have it.
Collaborator
|
r? @thomcc (rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
labels
Contributor
Author
|
@rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs |
added T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
and removed T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
labels
Member
|
Libs-api, needs FCP too. (Not sure if ACP is still needed for insta-stable trait impls?) r? @rust-lang/libs-api |
Member
|
Ah, IIRC @BurntSushi doesn't have time for reviews, so r? @Amanieu |
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Member
|
This seems reasonable, we already have the same for @rfcbot fcp merge |
|
Team member @Amanieu has proposed to merge this. The next step is review by the rest of the tagged team members: No concerns currently listed. Once a majority of reviewers approve (and at most 2 approvals are outstanding), this will enter its final comment period. If you spot a major issue that hasn't been raised at any point in this process, please speak up! See this document for info about what commands tagged team members can give me. |
added proposed-final-comment-period Proposed to merge/close by relevant subteam, see T-<team> label. Will enter FCP once signed off. disposition-merge This issue / PR is in PFCP or FCP with a disposition to merge it.
labels
added final-comment-period In the final comment period and will be merged soon unless new substantive objections are raised.
and removed proposed-final-comment-period Proposed to merge/close by relevant subteam, see T-<team> label. Will enter FCP once signed off.
labels
|
🔔 This is now entering its final comment period, as per the review above. 🔔 |
added finished-final-comment-period The final comment period is finished for this PR / Issue.
and removed final-comment-period In the final comment period and will be merged soon unless new substantive objections are raised.
labels
|
The final comment period, with a disposition to merge, as per the review above, is now complete. As the automated representative of the governance process, I would like to thank the author for their work and everyone else who contributed. This will be merged soon. |
Thanks!
Member
|
@bors r+ |
added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Contributor
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Collaborator
|
Finished benchmarking commit (46da927): comparison URL. Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)Results CyclesThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 631.947s -> 631.429s (-0.08%) |
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
None yet
Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
None yet
Recommend
About Joyk
Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK