5 Of The Best iPhone Apps For Calorie Counting

With the emergence of smartphones, it's become easier than ever to count your calories. Whether you're trying to lose weight or simply keep track of how much you're eating, there's a simple way to do it. The best calorie-counting apps are ones where you're able to log the meal you just ate to easily see how many calories you have remaining for the day.

iPhones, like Androids, have plenty of ways to track calories, but with so many apps flooding the market, it can be tough to track down what will work best for you. Many calorie-counting apps have both paid and free versions, with the paid version offering more features. It's important to consider cost when it comes to these apps, but many people will be fine with the free tiers. MyFitnessPal is probably the most popular and well-known of the bunch, and that has three different payment tiers available.

There's a reason MyFitnessPal is one of the most popular calorie counters, and it comes down to just how simple it all works. The home page of the app gives you a look at how many calories you've consumed in the day, and it'll also give you your recommended intake for the remainder of the day.

For many people, that's all they're really looking for. If that's the case for you, then the free version is perfect. The paid tier will offer some more features like recipes and meal prep. On top of this, you'll have the ability to scan barcodes to easily upload your calories, an analysis of what foods you've eaten are good or bad for you, and a totally ad-free experience. This is available at $19.99 a month or $79.99 a year, so while it's not cheap, it's also not the most expensive thing in the world if you're taking advantage of the features.

Lose It! is an alternative to using MyFitnessPal, and it works in pretty much the same way. A big change between the two is the fact that MyFitnessPal charges for the barcode scanner while Lose It! offers it as a free feature. There is a paid version of this app that costs $40 a year, but it's not all that necessary if you're in it for just the calorie-counting aspect of it.

The Premium version offers better tracking, the ability to sync to devices like your smartwatch, a personalized weight loss plan, and a way to plan meals in advance. All of this is nice, and it can be well worth the price of admission. It comes in at half the price of an annual price of MyFitnessPal, so it's definitely something to think about. If you're picking between the free tiers of these two apps, it does seem like Lose It! will come out a little bit ahead.

Noom might be an app you've heard of when listening to an ad from a podcaster or YouTuber, but it's solid even when people aren't being paid to promote it. The biggest downside to Noom is the fact it's quite pricy, coming in at $209 for an annual plan. However, it's a very easy-to-navigate app, and it takes a different approach to weight loss and calorie counting. This app comes with a coach that can help you out.

Instead of simply being a calorie counter, Noom will also try to change your eating habits in a positive way. It takes a psychological approach to weight loss, and it will teach you how to make better food choices by the end of it if everything goes according to plan. Obviously, your mileage may vary and it's quite expensive to take a gamble like this only for it to not work out in the end. There is a free trial period, but it's likely not going to be long enough to get the desired outcomes. You can subscribe for months at a time at a cheaper price, so that's probably the best route to start with.

Like Noom, Lifesum is an app that works to change your habits into a healthier lifestyle. It works the same way as the other apps where you're able to log your foods and look at your calories consumed daily, but there's more than meets the eye. You can create a basic meal plan that will map out what to eat for 21 days, and it includes four meals a day. On the surface, this might sound a lot like Noom, but what separates the two is the price.

Lifesum features a free version, or you can opt for a $99.99 annual plan, bringing it in at almost a third of the price from Noom. With this in mind, Lifesum becomes a real competitor that might not offer the exact same benefits, but it'll get close enough. Like Noom, you can sign up for intervals at a cheaper price. This includes $30 for three months and $50 for six months.

For a simple, yet effective, calorie counter, look no further than Calory. This app specializes in tracking calorie intake, and if that's all you're looking for then this will fit the bill. It doesn't feature all the fancy bells and whistles of other apps on the list, Calory is very effective at what it does. Tracking your calories is simple with Calory, and it lays it out for you through a bar chart that lets you easily take a quick glance to see how many calories you have left for the day.

All of this is available in the free tier, but there is a paid option available. For $14.99 a year, you'll get access to a barcode scanner and water tracker, among other things. There's even an AI that can help you make recipes. These are features some of the other apps offer for free, so consider going for those if you want the features. If you're looking for a calorie tracker and nothing else, Calory is a good fit.

10 Common Smartphone Apps That Are Killing Your Data

Over the past decade, the smartphone has gradually positioned itself at the core of human life. Almost every activity today revolves around smartphones, be it interacting with friends, hosting professional collaborations, or relaxing for some entertainment on the weekend. A major reason for this smartphone explosion lies in its versatility: with easy access to the internet and a combination of ever-improving hardware and software features, it enables software developers to build a variety of applications and deliver experiences that people love.

In terms of data consumption, however, some applications may be going too far to deliver these experiences to their users. Obtaining data to use the internet already costs a lot of money: the average American, for instance, spends almost $100 per month and about $1,166 annually on internet plans and streaming subscriptions only (via Reviews.org). And with frequent use of data-demanding apps and services, it is not uncommon to spend up to thrice the average amount on data.

Smartphone apps guzzle data in a variety of ways. Platforms like TikTok, which provides a new and high-quality video with every swipe, consume data through these rapid video downloads. Similarly, classic social media apps like Instagram and Facebook hook users on not only viewing multimedia posted by others but also posting theirs in high quality. And most notoriously, many smartphone apps consume data while running in the background. Today we're taking a look at a few common apps that are also notorious data hogs, along with a few suggestions on how to keep them in check.

Instagram originally rose to fame by focusing on photos. The app still retains some features characteristic of its early release: more emphasis on media (and less on text), high-resolution video and imagery, and of course, filters. Due to these features, it was immediately evident that Instagram would require more data than Facebook — widely perceived as the social media standard of the time — for a smoother experience.

With the addition of more functionality over the years and a change in how users navigate the platform, Instagram's data consumption has certainly increased. In terms of functionality, there are now Instagram Stories and Instagram Reels, more filters and edits for uploading media, and more integrations with third-party apps. With respect to use patterns, there's a noticeable increase in the number of videos posted, as well as stark competition among "insta celebrities" for a presence on the Explore page.

It's no surprise, then, that spending an hour daily on Instagram for a week can run your data balance down by 4.2 GB — if you're only scrolling through your home feed. The app will consume more data during uploads, averaging about 2MB per photo and much more for videos. Instagram users are provided with several options to limit data usage: stop pre-loading of videos, view high-resolution media using Wi-Fi only, or upload low-quality media. But all of these come at the cost of a smooth, fast, and enjoyable experience, which is Instagram's major selling point.

Along the stretch of content creation history, short videos stand out as a monumental and desired feature of social media apps. Instagram has Stories and Reels, YouTube has Shorts, and Snapchat videos are concise by design. Currently, though, no app dominates the short video space more strongly than TikTok, a platform that has risen so rapidly among the ranks. There are presently over 1 billion monthly active TikTok users, indicating that the app has outperformed projections to reach this figure by 2025.

Similar to Instagram, TikTok offers a slew of features that encourage its users to upload as frequently as they consume. Spurred by the desire to entertain people from everywhere and the status of having millions of followers, TikTokers spend several hours contributing to and receiving from the platform. But while TikTok's focus on short videos might give the impression that the app is data efficient, this is certainly not the case: users quickly discover that the platform tops the chart of data-guzzling social media apps.

Statistically, one hour of going through your TikTok feed consumes about 840MB of data. Scaling this up to the weekly level, it's easy to see how 10 GB worth of data could be used up by TikTok alone. And users who upload videos frequently can expect to use more than these amounts. All in all, the high data demands of TikTok perfectly illustrate the challenge of managing data for not just one application but the entire suite of smartphone apps run by the user.

With up to 500 hours of video uploaded to YouTube per minute, the platform services more than two billion active users every month. An observed feature of frequent YouTube use is the habit of users to binge-watch several videos in one niche — or by one creator — for hours on end. And whether these videos are on the latest tech gadgets or mouth-watering food recipes, viewers will not hesitate to exchange large amounts of data for such content.

But the excitement of using the platform quickly disappears upon receipt of a low data notification. And for many users, this notification comes quicker than expected. A detailed YouTube data usage experiment confirmed that YouTube zaps up to 2.7 GB for every 60 minutes of watching videos at 720p (HD) resolution and high bitrate (via Android Authority). This data consumption rises up to 23 GB per hour at 2160p (4k) resolution, and even at the lowest quality of 144p, the app still uses more than 1 MB per minute of video. 

YouTube also consumes data "in advance" by loading videos in a fashion that prevents buffering, such that the first five minutes of a 10-minute video could already be available with the user still at the two-minute mark. Plus, these do not put into perspective the enormous amounts of data required to upload video content, which also varies depending on each video's resolution. 

Also a video streaming platform, Netflix one-ups YouTube in several categories. The platform specializes in long-form content including movies and series, hosts both cartoons and live-action animated films, and — strangely enough — offers video games for its users. In a fiercely competitive streaming market, Netflix has retained its prominence and popularity: as of the third quarter of 2022, Netflix recorded more than 220 million paid subscribers worldwide.

As might be expected, then, Netflix also one-ups YouTube in terms of high data usage. The data consumption stats for using Netflix on a browser are themselves high: at standard definition, Netflix videos burn through up to 1 GB per hour; and increasing the quality to Full HD or 4k brings the hourly video consumption up to 3 GB or 7 GB respectively. On the mobile app, watching content at the "Maximum Data" mobile data usage setting can swallow more than 1 GB every 20 minutes. And the "Automatic" setting, for balancing video resolution and data expense, takes roughly 1 GB in four hours.

Like YouTube, Netflix also aims for non-buffering in the user experience. A major consequence of loading future parts of a video is that viewers who do not eventually finish a video would have expended more data than they used. To conserve data, in general, Netflix has options to reduce the quality of videos and downloads, watch videos at only a chosen quality, or toggle on the "Save Data" setting that automatically configures the app for reduced data usage.

Available on both Android and iOS devices, the Chrome browser is Google's ultimate tool for the internet. And as the most popular web browser in the world, Chrome does everything a browser should do and more. By default, the Chrome browser uses a lot of data to access the internet — be it for browsing web pages, reading documents, or viewing multimedia. The platform is optimized for speed, and its smooth experience is offered to the user in exchange for data intensity. And with improvements in smartphone hardware and software, Chrome will continue to evolve.

Depending on the website being visited or task being run, Chrome will consume varying amounts of data per unit time of work. The browser will also utilize data in tracking browsing history, recommending news articles in the Chrome feed, and running background processes to keep browser tabs open. Users can reduce Chrome's data consumption through the "Data Saver" settings on the Chrome app. And though this might compromise browser speed and smoothness, it will go a long way in conserving cellular data.

Launched in 2011, a year after Instagram, Snapchat entered the social media arena with its own idea of novelty. Its unique offerings of intelligent filters and disappearing multimedia caught the attention of social media enthusiasts on the lookout for the next big thing. And many of Snapchat's offerings formed the foundation for modified features on other social media apps, such as Instagram Stories and the filters contained therein. Snapchat has enjoyed significant growth in the number of users year-on-year, and currently, there are about 363 million active daily users of the platform — a testament to its maintained popularity among young people.

For early users of the smartphone app, it didn't take long to discover that Snapchat was a data-demanding software. Utilizing the multiple features provided by the app, for both self-expression and connecting with other Snapchat users, required several megabytes of data. More importantly, Snapchat worked in the background by default to preload Snaps and Stories. All of these contribute to the high data consumption by Snapchat, which can easily reach 20GB per month. 

Snapchat helps out users seeking to manage their data by providing a "Data Saver" toggle, which disables the preloading. With this option turned on, users can only download and view Snaps when online and if relevant to them. In fact, it is recommended that this option remains on if the user does not have an unlimited data subscription, or when trying to keep data expenditure below a set limit.

As the app credited for sparking today's social media era, Facebook has continually evolved to keep pace with the competition. Its almost 20-year journey has seen the platform grow from a mere network of friends to an information-sharing site, a marketplace to grow businesses and a top choice for social media influencers. Even after so many years, Facebook still remains populated with users: as of the third quarter of 2022, Facebook had almost 3 billion monthly active users — making it the most utilized social media platform worldwide. 

In improving its product offering, Facebook has introduced a host of features over the last few years. This includes its ever-improving interface allowing for a smoother experience, in-app features like Facebook Stories and Reels, and even meetings with Facebook Rooms. Facebook also followed in the footsteps of Instagram to allow for high-resolution media uploads, media autoplay, and preloading. While these features have certainly raised the bar for Facebook as a multifaceted social media platform, they have also contributed to its increased data consumption over time.

To put Facebook's data usage in perspective, merely scrolling through the home feed gulps almost 50 MB in five minutes and up to 480 MB per hour. If there are more videos than average on the feed, users will most likely expend more than these amounts of data. And as with other social media platforms, uploading and sharing media takes its own toll on the data balance. All of these can be managed by configuring Facebook data settings.

Just as YouTube dominates the video content space, Spotify is at the pinnacle of music streaming. The platform hosts all kinds and genres of music, providing a significant amount of revenue for music and podcast creators depending on their public streams. Spotify rose to its peak by delivering for both its free and premium customers, and this explains why the platform currently boasts 456 million users and 195 million premium subscribers.

Since its inception in 2006, Spotify has worked to improve the user experience features on its platform. From the app's interface to audio quality, to its integration with automotive audio systems, users can listen to music whenever and however they wish. But in terms of data consumption, Spotify shares the same issue with video streaming platforms like YouTube and Netflix. Music is essentially re-downloaded when it is streamed, and unless a user saves tracks offline, every instance of listening to the same songs would waste data unnecessarily. This is why Spotify offers the option of offline saving for its premium subscribers.

Furthermore, the amount of data consumed depends on the music quality: it was found that listening at normal quality (96kbps) burns 40 MB per hour, and this increases to 70 MB hourly for high quality (160kbps) and 150 MB hourly for extreme quality (320kbps). In this regard, Spotify lets users decide on the quality of music they listen to. Navigating to the "Settings" section of the app, users will also find the option to toggle Automatic quality, which is recommended.

Twitter is another of the world's most popular social media platforms, and it is perhaps one of the most controversial. The Blue Bird app accommodates people from all spheres of life, creating an opportunity for self-expression in a few words. With almost 400 million users globally and over 500 million tweets sent per day, Twitter is the go-to platform for news, trends, entertainment, and political discourse. And all of these come with a huge demand for data, which users can manage using the data usage settings that Twitter provides.

With a 280-character limit on tweets, Twitter aims for users to share information without consuming too many resources. So far, this has worked out well for the platform, in terms of both keeping users engaged and retaining its audience. But Twitter still records a high level of data consumption, which is proof that the users really determine the direction of a smartphone application. 

For Twitter, in particular, the prevalence of multimedia — and all the features that support them — is its greatest undoing. Today's Twitter users are accustomed to sharing more images and videos, and going through one's Twitter feed is becoming less different from the experience on Instagram. Twitter also has a default autoplay setting, such that images and videos immediately load when they appear on the screen, regardless of their quality or resolution. Fortunately, the app contains options to reduce cellular data consumption by disabling autoplay, viewing high-quality videos with Wi-Fi only, or never viewing high-quality videos at all.

Ranking among the most popular instant messaging platforms in the world, WhatsApp has become for some the go-to option for sending messages, even preferred over SMS texts. The app is used by more than two billion people worldwide every month, also placing it among the most popular smartphone apps overall. WhatsApp promotes itself as a low-data platform, and to some extent this is true. Text messages and voice notes consume only kilobytes, and even audio calls use less than 1 MB per minute. In addition, WhatsApp has a reputation for reducing media quality and size, which it does by using a compression algorithm. This quality reduction also applies to videos and status updates, and while some users like it for its data-saving effect, others despise it for the unwanted drop in quality.

In any case, these are the low-data features of WhatsApp. Video calls tell a different story: it's estimated that WhatsApp takes up to 5 MB per minute on 4G-based video calls and 3.75 MB per minute on 3G. Moreover, while a single photo, video, or status update may not consume that much data, viewing several media or watching friends' status updates for hours — or uploading these yourself — could drain your data balance. WhatsApp also expends cellular data to back up chats and media to the cloud, and this is one of the features that are limited upon toggling on the "Low Data Usage" setting.

Given that many of these smartphone apps already feature options to reduce data usage, a lot of data can indeed be saved from the apps alone. The data usage options can usually be found after navigating to "Settings" on the application. Of course, the exact data-saving settings will differ based on the platform: while some might limit the quality of media that you view, others can also limit the quality of media that you upload. And yet others might be focused on saving offline, so you do not have to repeatedly download media. The major advantage of these settings is that the user is positioned to create an optimal experience that, even if not at the highest quality, works just fine for the user.

In addition, smartphone operating systems provide overarching settings to limit data consumption. On the iPhone, users can find the "Low Data Mode" setting to stop data-intensive processes from running in the background, disable automatic downloads, and pause updates to Apple-native apps and services. This option can be found in the "Cellular Data Options" tab of the iPhone settings. Also, Android devices offer multiple settings to monitor and reduce data exhaustion. Navigating to the "Networks & Internet" option (or similar) in the Android settings, users can find toggles to disable auto-sync and data roaming, receive data usage warnings, and automatically turn off mobile data when a limit is reached. With these options, users can manage data optimally.