Panic instead of truncating if the incremental on-disk cache is too big by saeth...
source link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/110632
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.
Panic instead of truncating if the incremental on-disk cache is too big #110632
Conversation
Contributor
It seems unlikely that anyone would hit this truncation, but if this as does actually truncate, that seems incredibly bad.
Collaborator
|
r? @lcnr (rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
added A-query-system Area: The rustc query system (https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/query.html) S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
labels
Contributor
|
@bors r+ rollup |
Commit added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
changed the title
Panic instead of truncating if the dep graph is too big
Panic instead of truncating if the incremental on-disk cache is too big
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
No reviews
None yet
Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
None yet
Recommend
About Joyk
Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK