Iceberg Capital and the Venom Foundation, both headquartered in Abu Dhabi, have formed a strategic alliance to invest $1 billion in a range of Web3 applications.

As a result, the ‘blockchain-agnostic’ Venom Ventures Fund aims to invest in ‘innovative protocols and Web3 dApps … DeFi, banking services, and GameFi,’ the two Middle Eastern investment groups said in a statement.

Venom’s range of services is comprehensive, with plans to operate a venture capital arm and a startup incubator, as well as provide advisory services for founders, as stated on its website.

The company will also invest across the entire spectrum of startups ranging from grants of $25,000 – $200,000, to equity investments that span from seed-stage checks to late-stage capital.

“On the Venom Ventures side, our view is we will do from Seed to Series, A, B, C to IPO,” said Peter Knez, one of 2 people in charge of the fund. “Restricting yourself by stage rather than by quality of opportunity, if you have the capital, doesn’t really make sense — if you can do the homework.”

The fund and its size is coming at a period of suppressed activity in the crypto and blockchain industry which was rocked by multiple implosions in 2022.

“Even though the blockchain industry is witnessing a steep correction in prices, we believe that builders will continue to build and innovate,” Mustafa Kheriba, the other spokesperson for the fund said.

A good time to launch something like this is when liquidity is scarce. You can show up with a lot of capital and there’s a lot of people – good projects – that are having a hard time getting capital.”

According to its website, the fund aims to be the point where ‘old money meets new.’ The VVF team, in general, has a track record of expanding both Web3 and traditional funds, as well as providing growth capital for both startups and scaleups.

The creation of Venom Ventures is the result of a collaboration between Abu Dhabi-based Venom Foundation and Iceberg Capital, an investment management firm that is locally regulated. Venom is a Layer 1 blockchain that is licensed by the Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM) and is specifically designed to cater to the requirements of the Middle East, North Africa, and other emerging markets.

The primary objective of the fund is to promote and support the growth of the Web3 industry in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), which has been a significant focus for the country in recent times.

Interested parties can submit their projects here.

__________________________________

Follow us on Twitter for latest posts and updates

Join and interact with our Telegram community

__________________________________

__________________________________

Governance tokens are one of the innovations in crypto meant to enhance democratic decision-making, letting holders of the tokens vote on decisions of a  blockchain project.

Governance token holders can decide on many actions including making changes to a user interface of a product, how to distribute fees and rewards in the ecosystem, and changes to the underlying project code.

Other than voting, governance tokens have more use cases including:

• Staking
• Taking Loans
• Yield Farming

These tokens types are used across different projects including Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs), DeFi, and Decentralized Applications (Dapps). ‘Decentralized’ is a common keyword among these projects highlighting the key motivation for governance tokens – distributing power and ownership.

There are multiple ways that users can become holders of a governance token, depending on the criteria for ownership set by any given project. Typically, users who have made significant contributions or demonstrated loyalty to the project have the most chances of claiming these tokens.

A project’s criteria can also include how the tokens are distributed among members, usually including how much is available to different sets of stakeholders such as founders, investors, users, etc.

Governance tokens also come with differences in scope, depending on factors including the criteria for ownership and uses, as well as the success of a project. Some of the functionalities that you can expect from different projects include:

• Voting on a limited number of governance issues
• Voting on development updates
• Smart contract revisions
• Generating financial returns

Below is a list of the leading governance tokens by market capitalization (as of March 5 2023):

• Uniswap ($UNI): $4.7 billion
• Internet Computer ($ICP): $1.6 billion
• Aave ($AAVE): $1.1 billion
• Synthetic Network ($SNX): $940 million
• Maker ($MKR): $794 million
• Dash ($DASH): $758 million
• PancakeSwap ($CAKE): $702 million

Case Study: MAKERDAO

Till today, MAKERDAO represents one of the most successful applications of governance tokens, even more so when you consider that it is one of the most successful crypto projects out there.

At the time of writing, MAKERDAO’s DAI stablecoin is one of the most highly-rated stablecoins with a market capitalization of over $5.9 billion and daily volumes exceeding $500 million.

Holders of the governance token $MKR can vote on fees, rules, and team member appointments. One token is equal to a single vote and decisions are adopted based on the number of votes.

Case Study: COMPOUND

Lending and borrowing protocol, Compound, also lets users vote on important decisions using the Compound token ($COMP).

Users receive the tokens based on their activity on the Compound Network such that users who lend and borrow more often have more chances to be awarded the governance token.

The $COMP token also carries one vote like the $MKR token and holders can delegate their token to other voters to vote on their behalf. The Compound protocol is 100% controlled by token holders since 2020 when the project gave up the network’s admin key.

Utility Tokens vs Governance Tokens

Utility tokens and governance tokens are similar and can probably intersect, however, the main difference is understood by their definitions.

Utility tokens are a type of digital asset that can be used for a given purpose, such as paying fees or getting access to a certain product or service. On the other hand, governance tokens give holders a stake in running a project, something that users cannot do with utility tokens.

As we have covered in the introduction, governance tokens also carry some utility functions which can include staking and taking out loans. These are utility benefits that come in addition to a governance token’s hallmark which is giving holders a say in the running of the project.

Below is an outline of the key advantages of governance tokens:

• The best way so far that DeFi projects can implement decentralization
• Incentivize users to remain involved with the project
• It helps the project to only work on features that the community wants

When it comes to drawbacks, governance tokens can sometimes be complex and may be difficult for community members to understand and apply. One of the key issues with governance tokens is that wealthy holders can amass most of the tokens and dominate control of the network.

_______________________________________

Follow us on Twitter for the latest posts and updates

Join and interact with our Telegram community

_______________________________________

_______________________________________