M-SOLUTIONS Programming Contest 2021(AtCoder Beginner Contest 232) Announcement
source link: http://codeforces.com/blog/entry/98057
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.
We will hold M-SOLUTIONS Programming Contest 2021(AtCoder Beginner Contest 232).
The point values will be 100-200-300-400-500-500-600-600.
We are looking forward to your participation!
22 hours ago, # |
C++20 support when
How to solve C ? I'm just getting WA on one case and AC on the other 21 — Submission sad noises
-
lmao I did the same exact thing, I would like to know why this doesn't work as well
-
Yes even i did the same thing.. and got WA.
I realized later that "the degree sequence of two graphs should be same to be isomorphic" — this is a necessary but not sufficient condition.
So what I did was to store the component sizes of each node of two graphs and checked if both are equal. Luckily it passed. But this too is wrong!
I guess the test cases are weak.
This the the ac code which I wrote:
However this code gives wrong answer on this test case:
6 5 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 3 6 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 2 6
The answer should be "No" but my code prints "Yes"
I didn't see the constraints initially (stupid mistake I know). But the intended solution is to use brute force
-
-
Your solution is actually very wrong, it should definitely not pass that many testcases. Graph isomorphism is a hard problem, in here you just need to enumerate all permutations P from the statement and check whether the statement condition holds. You can do that with std::next_permutation().
-
I implemented the intended solution but used adjacency list instead of adjacency matrix and failed 5 cases. Can you please help me figure out what's up?
-
I also did the same way and got AC but my condition to check whether the permutation is valid or not is different.
Here is my Submission: https://atcoder.jp/contests/abc232/submissions/28008891
-
-
My submission also fails on only one test case. Weak tests I guess. next_permutation worked.
-
-
Use the edge connectivities, not the degrees. Two graphs might have the same degrees but aren't isomorphic.
Try this input
6 5 1 2 2 3 2 4 4 5 5 6 1 2 2 3 3 4 2 5 5 6
-
Can you please share an example of when the degrees are equivalent but the graphs are not isomorphic?
-
Check the structures of 2-Methylpentane and 3-Methylpentane. Same degrees, but not graph isomers.
-
16 hours ago, # |
can we solve F with flow.
15 hours ago, # |
For problem E, how do you find theses DP optimization ideas ?
14 hours ago, # |
Can anyone explain, how we are getting 4 distinct value from f(k,i,j) and how we are forming those transitions? It would be a great help. Thanks!
My approach for E is different from the editorial, and I'm getting wrong answer on a few test cases. Any help would be much appreciated. Submission: Link
Approach: We are at (x1,y1) and want to reach (x2,y2) after exactly k operations. in one operation we can change either x or y. Let's say that we change x in p operations and y in k-p operations, and let dp1[p] be the number of ways to start from x1 and end at x2 after exactly p operations and dp2[k-p] be the number of ways to reach from y1 to y2 after exactly p-k operations, then I will add C(k,p)*dp1[p]*dp2[k-p] to my answer. (C(k,p) is the number of ways to select p operations that will change x out of the k operations)
Now as far as dp1 and dp2 are concerned. We can precalculate both of then as follows: dp1[i] = (w-1)^(i-1) — dp1[i-1]
dp1[0] is 1 if x1 = x2 and 0 otherwise
dp2[i] = (h-1)^(i-1) — dp2[i-1]
dp2[0] is 1 if y1 = y2 and 0 otherwise
Can anyone point out the flaw in this approach?
8 hours ago, # |
Can someone explain the solution of problem E.
-
I solved it using recursive DP. We just have to maintain that the if our current row matches with the final row or not, and our current column matches with current column or not( Actual row and column values don't matter here ,we just need to maintain that they are equal to final ones or not, so we can use 0/1 to denote that) . So currently if we are in same row as the final row, we can go to any other row and it will be equivalent (n-1 such rows) . If we are in some other row, we have two choices, either we can go to the final row or some other row (n-2 such rows). So similarly we can do it for columns. After K moves we can check if our both row and column are equal to final row and column or not. dp will look like dp[2][2][K] and each transition will be done in constant time . So overall Time complexity will be O(K).
Submission : https://atcoder.jp/contests/abc232/submissions/28006837
Recommend
About Joyk
Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK