25

M-SOLUTIONS Programming Contest 2021(AtCoder Beginner Contest 232) Announcement

 2 years ago
source link: http://codeforces.com/blog/entry/98057
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.
neoserver,ios ssh client

We will hold M-SOLUTIONS Programming Contest 2021(AtCoder Beginner Contest 232).

The point values will be 100-200-300-400-500-500-600-600.

We are looking forward to your participation!

22 hours ago, # |

C++20 support when

16 hours ago, # |

Rev. 2  

+3

How to solve C ? I'm just getting WA on one case and AC on the other 21 — Submission sad noises

  • 16 hours ago, # ^ |

    Rev. 2  

    0

    lmao I did the same exact thing, I would like to know why this doesn't work as well

    • 15 hours ago, # ^ |

      Rev. 2  

      +9

      Yes even i did the same thing.. and got WA.

      I realized later that "the degree sequence of two graphs should be same to be isomorphic" — this is a necessary but not sufficient condition.

      So what I did was to store the component sizes of each node of two graphs and checked if both are equal. Luckily it passed. But this too is wrong!

      I guess the test cases are weak.

      This the the ac code which I wrote:

      However this code gives wrong answer on this test case:

      6 5
      1 2
      2 3
      3 4
      4 5
      3 6
      1 2
      2 3
      3 4
      4 5
      2 6

      The answer should be "No" but my code prints "Yes"

      I didn't see the constraints initially (stupid mistake I know). But the intended solution is to use brute force

  • 16 hours ago, # ^ |

    Your solution is actually very wrong, it should definitely not pass that many testcases. Graph isomorphism is a hard problem, in here you just need to enumerate all permutations P from the statement and check whether the statement condition holds. You can do that with std::next_permutation().

    • 16 hours ago, # ^ |

      I implemented the intended solution but used adjacency list instead of adjacency matrix and failed 5 cases. Can you please help me figure out what's up?

    • 12 hours ago, # ^ |

      My submission also fails on only one test case. Weak tests I guess. next_permutation worked.

  • 16 hours ago, # ^ |

    Use next_permutation()

  • 16 hours ago, # ^ |

    Rev. 5  

    +4

    Use the edge connectivities, not the degrees. Two graphs might have the same degrees but aren't isomorphic.

    Try this input

    6 5 
    1 2 
    2 3 
    2 4 
    4 5 
    5 6 
    1 2 
    2 3 
    3 4 
    2 5 
    5 6 
    • 16 hours ago, # ^ |

      Can you please share an example of when the degrees are equivalent but the graphs are not isomorphic?

      • 16 hours ago, # ^ |

        _\_ _\_ and _\_\_ _

      • 16 hours ago, # ^ |

        I added an example to my comment.

      • 16 hours ago, # ^ |

        Check the structures of 2-Methylpentane and 3-Methylpentane. Same degrees, but not graph isomers.

  • 16 hours ago, # ^ |

    Brute force all the permutations using std::next_permutation() and check if the condition mentioned holds true

16 hours ago, # |

can we solve F with flow.

15 hours ago, # |

For problem E, how do you find theses DP optimization ideas ?

14 hours ago, # |

Can anyone explain, how we are getting 4 distinct value from f(k,i,j) and how we are forming those transitions? It would be a great help. Thanks!

14 hours ago, # |

Rev. 6  

0

My approach for E is different from the editorial, and I'm getting wrong answer on a few test cases. Any help would be much appreciated. Submission: Link

Approach: We are at (x1,y1) and want to reach (x2,y2) after exactly k operations. in one operation we can change either x or y. Let's say that we change x in p operations and y in k-p operations, and let dp1[p] be the number of ways to start from x1 and end at x2 after exactly p operations and dp2[k-p] be the number of ways to reach from y1 to y2 after exactly p-k operations, then I will add C(k,p)*dp1[p]*dp2[k-p] to my answer. (C(k,p) is the number of ways to select p operations that will change x out of the k operations)

Now as far as dp1 and dp2 are concerned. We can precalculate both of then as follows: dp1[i] = (w-1)^(i-1) — dp1[i-1]

dp1[0] is 1 if x1 = x2 and 0 otherwise

dp2[i] = (h-1)^(i-1) — dp2[i-1]

dp2[0] is 1 if y1 = y2 and 0 otherwise

Can anyone point out the flaw in this approach?

  • 13 hours ago, # ^ |

    Rev. 2  

    0

    How about this (3×2)(3×2) chessboard?

    E E Source E Target E

    There is exactly one way to go from source to target in 2 moves, while your code reports it to be zero.

  • 13 hours ago, # ^ |

    The approach is fine. I implemented the same method and got AC. Here is my implementation. Sub

14 hours ago, # |

Rev. 2  

+10

One of the best atcoder contests

8 hours ago, # |

Can someone explain the solution of problem E.

  • 39 minutes ago, # ^ |

    Rev. 3  

    +3

    I solved it using recursive DP. We just have to maintain that the if our current row matches with the final row or not, and our current column matches with current column or not( Actual row and column values don't matter here ,we just need to maintain that they are equal to final ones or not, so we can use 0/1 to denote that) . So currently if we are in same row as the final row, we can go to any other row and it will be equivalent (n-1 such rows) . If we are in some other row, we have two choices, either we can go to the final row or some other row (n-2 such rows). So similarly we can do it for columns. After K moves we can check if our both row and column are equal to final row and column or not. dp will look like dp[2][2][K] and each transition will be done in constant time . So overall Time complexity will be O(K).

    Submission : https://atcoder.jp/contests/abc232/submissions/28006837


About Joyk


Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK