13

notesutils/notes.md at master · dunhamsteve/notesutils · GitHub

 2 years ago
source link: https://github.com/dunhamsteve/notesutils/blob/master/notes.md
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.
neoserver,ios ssh client

Notes on Notes.app

For future reference and to aid anyone else who might want to extract data from the "Notes" app. I compiled this out of curiosity and a desire to backup my notes content.

This document only covers the current format of notes, as synced with iCloud. The application also supports IMAP synced notes with reduced functionality. They are stored in a separate database (and on the IMAP server). You're on your own there, but it's pretty much just MIME and HTML.

OSX Files

The notes are stored in ~/Library/Group Containers/group.com.apple.notes in a sqlite database named NoteStore.sqlite. The database contains sync state from iCloud. It's a CoreData store, but I approached it from plain sqlite.

We're interested in the ZICCLOUDSYNCINGOBJECT table and the ZICNOTEDATA table. The former contains the sync state of each iCloud object - notes, attachments, and folders, and the latter contains the note data. Everything has a UUID identifier ZIDENTIFIER. The ZICCLOUDSYNCINGOBJECT table column ZNOTEDATA points to the Z_PK column in ZICNOTEDATA. The meat of the data is in zlib compressed protobuf blobs. For documents, it's ZDATA in ZNOTEDATA and for tables/drawings, it's ZMERGEABLEDATA in ZICCLOUDSYNCINGOBJECT.

Apple uses a CvRDT for syncing (evidenced by various strings appearing in the data and analysis of what happens as you edit). I suspect the one used for documents, which they call "topotext" is not actually a CvRDT (they seem to order conflicts on a first to sync basis rather than vector clock) but I could be mistaken. It doesn't matter since everything goes through iCloud, which serializes the merges.

Protobuf Data

Document Wrapper Everything is wrapped with a versioned document object:

message Document {
    repeated Version version = 2;
}
message Version {
    optional bytes data = 3;
}

There are additional fields that aren't relevant to us, and I've never seen more than one version. The content of the data field is also protobuf but varies depending on whether we're looking at a note, table, or drawing.

Notes The protobuf data for a note is a String as described below. Assume everything is optional and I’ve elided the CRDT stuff. (Repeated field 3 of String is a sequence clock, length, attribute clock, tombstone, and children. It forms a DAG. For chunks of length >1 the clock is implicitly incremented for each character.)

message String {
    string string = 2;
    // these are in order, disjoint, and their length sums to the length of string
    repeated AttributeRun attributeRun = 5;
}
message AttributeRun {
    uint32 length = 1;
    ParagraphStyle paragraphStyle = 2;
    Font font = 3;    
    uint32 fontHints = 5; // 1:bold, 2:italic, 3:bold italic
    uint32 underline = 6;
    uint32 strikethrough = 7;
    int32 superscript = 8; // sign indicates super/subscript
    string link = 9;
    Color color = 10;
    AttachmentInfo attachmentInfo = 12;
}
message ParagraphStyle {
    // 0:title, 1:heading, 4:monospace, 100:dotitem, 101:dashitem, 102:numitem, 
    // 103:todoitem
    uint32 style = 1;
    uint32 alignment = 2; // 0:left, 1:center, 2:right, 3:justified
    int32 indent = 4;
    Todo todo = 5;
}
message Font {
    string name = 1;
    float pointSize = 2;
    uint32 fontHints = 3;
}
message AttachmentInfo {
    string attachmentIdentifier = 1;
    string typeUTI = 2;
}
message Todo {
    bytes todoUUID = 1;
    bool done = 2;
}
message Color {
    float red = 1;
    float green = 2;
    float blue = 3;
    float alpha = 4;
}

Drawings This info isn’t strictly necessary. For each drawing, you’ll find a rendering in FallbackImages/UUID.jpg. I was curious whether I could recover / backup the original vector data, so I came up with the following. (The root object here is Drawing.)

message Drawing {
    int64 serializationVersion = 1;
    repeated bytes replicaUUIDs = 2;
    repeated StrokeID versionVector = 3;
    repeated Ink inks = 4;
    repeated Stroke strokes = 5;
    int64 orientation = 6;
    StrokeID orientationVersion = 7;
    Rectangle bounds = 8;
    bytes uuid = 9;
}
message Color {
    float red = 1;
    float green = 2;
    float blue = 3;
    float alpha = 4;
}
message Rectangle {
    float height = 4;
    float originX = 1;
    float originY = 2;
    float width = 3;
}
message Transform {
    float a = 1;
    float b = 2;
    float c = 3;
    float d = 4;
    float tx = 5;
    float ty = 6;
}
message Ink {
    Color color = 1;
    string identifier = 2;
    int64 version = 3;
}
message Stroke {
    int64 inkIndex = 3;
    int64 pointsCount = 4;
    bytes points = 5;
    Rectangle bounds = 6;
    bool hidden = 9;
    double timestamp = 11;
    bool createdWithFinger = 12;
    Transform transform = 10;
}

The byte array points is compactly encoded list of points. It is a sequence of this struct:

struct PKCompressedStrokePoint {
    float timestamp;            // timestamp (delta from somethin, probably previous)
    float xpos;
    float ypos;
    unsigned short radius;      // radius*10
    unsigned short aspectRatio; // aspectRatio*1000
    unsigned short edgeWidth;   // edgeWidth*10
    unsigned short force;       // force*1000
    unsigned short azimuth;     // azimuth*10430.2191955274
    unsigned char altitude;     // altitude*162.338041953733
    unsigned char opacity;      // opacity*255
};

The inkIndex field points into the array inks. The identifier in an Ink includes stuff like com.apple.ink.marker. I kinda fudged this in my svg generation - apple’s rendering code is much more sophisticated, taking azimuth/altitude into account. My code works well enough for pen, but falls short on marker. You may be better off with the jpeg.

Tables This one is complicated, and I think a bit of explanation is in order to explain why it’s structured this way. They are trying to model a table with multiple people editing at the same time. Editing the contents of a cell is essentially a solved problem (it’s complicated, but it’s solved above - each cell is its own "document” - a String object from above).

But in addition to this, people are adding, removing, and reordering columns. You want to ensure that if two people move a column or one person adds a column and another adds a row, things end up in a sane state, no matter which order you see the operations.

To do this, we consider the rows to be an ordered set of uuids. (And the same for the columns.) Then you have a map of column guid → row guid → String object.

The data itself a pile of CRDTs encoded with something like NSKeyedArchiver, but built on top of protobuf for these CRDTs. The root object contains a few tables, and a list of objects (like NSKeyedArchiver), and reverenced by index via a variant time that apple calls ObjectID. (I managed to figure this out by generically decoding the protobuf data and looking at it, but later found they ship an older revision of the proto files to their web app.)

This is the variant type used below:

message ObjectID {
    uint64 unsignedIntegerValue = 2;
    string stringValue = 4;
    uint32 objectIndex = 6;
}

The objectIndex is a index into the list of object in Document.

The root Document is:

message Document {   
    repeated DocObject object = 3;
    repeated string keyItem = 4;
    repeated string typeItem = 5;
    repeated bytes uuidItem = 6;
}

message DocObject {
    RegisterLatest registerLatest = 1;
    Dictionary dictionary = 6;
    String string = 10;  // this is our fancy String above
    CustomObject custom = 13;
    OrderedSet orderedSet = 16;    
}

The first object in the object field is the root object. A CustomObject is essentially a key/value map with a type. The keys are indexed from keyItem and type is from typeItem.

message CustomObject {
    int32 type = 1; // index into "typeItem" below
    message MapEntry {
        required int32 key = 1; // index into keyItem below
        required ObjectID value = 2;
    }
    repeated MapEntry mapEntry = 3;
}

For a UUID, the type is com.apple.CRDT.NSUUID and there is a UUIDIndex field whose value is the index of the UUID in uuidItem of the Document.

A RegisterLatest is just a CRDT for a value. There is a clock, not shown here, which helps with merging conflicts. It’s last write wins. It only appears to be used to point at an NSString custom object holding “CRTableColumnDirectionLeftToRight”. I’m ignoring this at the moment.

message RegisterLatest {
    ObjectID contents = 2;
}

A Dictionary object holds object id for both key and value. In practice the keys points to a UUID CustomObject and the value is either a UUID or another dictionary. (This is a last-write-wins CRDT, I’m leaving out the clock values.)

message Dictionary {
    message Element {
       ObjectID key = 1;
       ObjectID value = 2;
    }
    repeated Element element = 1;
}

Which leaves us with OrderedSet. An ordered set leverages String to provide an vector of UUIDs via TTArray. Pairs of string position to UUID are stored in attachments of TTArray. Surrounding that is Array which has a CRDT Dictionary to map the uuid of the TTArray to the content in that position of the array (which happens to also be a UUID in this case). And surrounding that is OrderedSet which contains another Dictionary of UUID to UUID, but the keys and values are the same (uuids from the TTArray space). This seems to be used to filter out deleted items in the case where you simultaneously move and delete a column. (The move does delete + add and the delete does a delete, so a copy remains in the Array.)

Two conflicting moves will also create duplicates in the array. Apple appears to handle this by ignoring all but the first instance. (And cleaning it up on the next move of that column.)

message OrderedSet {
    Array ordering = 1;
    Dictionary elements = 2; // set of elements that haven't been deleted
}
message Array {
    TTArray array = 1; // TTArray
    Dictionary contents = 2; // map of TTArray uuid to content uuid
}
message TTArray {
    String contents = 1; // we don't actually reference this.
    ArrayAttachment attachments = 2; // list of (position -> uuid
}
message ArrayAttachment {
    int64 index = 1;
    bytes uuid = 2;
}

Decoding Tables

Ok, so to decode a table, the root object will be a CustomObject with the fields:

Field Value

crRows OrderedSet for row uuids

crColumns OrderedSet for column uuids

cellColumns Dictionary of column uuid → Dictionary of row uuid → String

The value of these fields are referenced by objectIndex. Both crRows and crColumns are a CustomObject of type OrderedSet.

To get the list of uuids for these ordered sets, take each ordering.array.attachments.uuid, filter out values that don’t appear as keys in elements , and look up each of the resulting values in the dictionary ordering.contents.

Then iterate through the column uuids and look them up in cellColumns. The result, for each column, will be a dictionary. In this dictionary, look up each row uuid. The result, if present, will be a String object (or rather an ObjectId pointing to a String object). This is the content of the table cell.

I still need to write up the attachment, folder, and encryption stuff.


About Joyk


Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK