9

They're measuring with zero gap in the pro version, but the issue is still the s...

 2 years ago
source link: https://twitter.com/andreif7/status/1447303538066006018
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.
neoserver,ios ssh client
Don’t miss what’s happening
People on Twitter are the first to know.

Tweet

See new Tweets

Conversation

The problem the community is having is correctly measuring average power via various methods. This is an inherent problem of data sampling and power profile of things. For example, these are 308, 309 & 310 subtests in GB5:
Geekbench have a gap between each test. It makes lots people measuring average power of GB5 at sampling at like once in two second are totally meaningless.Or just measuring energy is way meaningful.
Replying to
They're measuring with zero gap in the pro version, but the issue is still the same with intra-workload power waveform and insufficient sample rate.
Replying to
If it just mensuring power at every moments at such low sample rate,sure it gonna make a lots of issue. I thought if it's measuring the total energy between each sampling and give it average power at least can makes measurement of energy is right.
The iOS kernel API describes it as instantaneous power and we saw run to run variation of 25%, so it's not a coloumb counter.
Relevant people
VUP / tech nerd / smartphone or PC hardware review / solid rocket motor / dieshot My own website: http://xian333c.top

About Joyk


Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK