4

The only way an “edit” feature on Twitter would work

 3 years ago
source link: https://uxdesign.cc/the-only-way-an-edit-feature-on-twitter-would-work-f3d382c32c0c
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.
neoserver,ios ssh client

The only way an “edit” feature on Twitter would work

How to provide what users want, while keeping them accountable for what they tweet

Twitter contextual menu showing a fake edit function
Twitter contextual menu showing a fake edit function

If you’re on Twitter, you surely know that one of the most common feature requests from users is the infamous edit button. Twitter, since the beginning, never offered the chance to editing tweets; you can either leave it or delete it (and rewrite it, if you want).

Twitter users seem to not be able to come to terms with this, even after almost 15 years since Twitter launched.

collection of tweets from users asking for an edit
collection of tweets from users asking for an edit

Most social platforms offer this feature. Facebook, Linkedin, Youtube, Medium, etc, all let you edit your posts. But Jack Dorsey (and other people at Twitter) said multiple times they will probably never do that.

If the edit tweet existed though, we would never really know how dumb some celebrities can be. I’m joking of course — they could prove it in many other ways. But nonetheless, the possibility of tweeting something problematic and then not being accountable for it, thanks to sly editing when you realize things went sideways, would make Twitter a real hell (I mean, worse than now).

Twitter is widely used by politicians, probably more than any other platform, to make statements, endorse or condemn things, and basically push their agenda and talk to their base. We NEED to keep them accountable for what they tweet. Imagine someone like Donald Trump, who i̶s̶ was tweeting all day long some very controversial takes on pretty much everything. You want to be sure they take responsibility for what they tweet.

The problem with retweets

What if I retweet something and the author then changes it completely? Imagine someone tweeting how they hate pineapple on pizza. I’d agree with them and maybe I’d support it by retweeting. Now this person edits the tweet and says that pineapple is a great pizza topping. As an Italian, I might risk losing my passport for retweeting something like that!
It’s a joke, but that could have serious consequences. What if I retweet something nice a colleague of mine says about our company or boss, then she/he gets fired and edits the tweet to something mean? Without knowing what the original tweet was I might end up in trouble. And this retweet issue could escalate up to possibly even criminal charges and investigations, in extreme cases.

We obviously don’t want that. So is there a solution? Maybe. This is mine:

gif of my solution for editing tweets, showing versioning of an edited tweet
gif of my solution for editing tweets, showing versioning of an edited tweet

Keeping a history of the tweet edits as nested independent tweets is, in my opinion, the only way to solve this.
If I retweet something that later gets edited, my retweet stays the same, the edit is just creating another version of that tweet, that I did not endorse. If I’m ok with the edit I can retweet once more, but nobody can put words in my mouth without me knowing it.

screen of my solution with nested versions of the edited tweet
screen of my solution with nested versions of the edited tweet

The delete function would be global for all the versions, so I couldn’t delete just one version. Answers to the tweet would be nested to the version they answered to.

Is it more complex? Maybe, and this is just one of the possible solutions, probably the most obvious one. What is sure though, is that no edit is better than what could happen with editing without accountability.

What do you think?

My new book “Designing Digital Products for Kids”!

0*Z_1_OI9BnzsDkgna?q=20
the-only-way-an-edit-feature-on-twitter-would-work-f3d382c32c0c
The UX Collective donates US$1 for each article published on our platform. This story contributed to Bay Area Black Designers: a professional development community for Black people who are digital designers and researchers in the San Francisco Bay Area. By joining together in community, members share inspiration, connection, peer mentorship, professional development, resources, feedback, support, and resilience. Silence against systemic racism is not an option. Build the design community you believe in.

About Joyk


Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK