4

Neuralink's First Human Patient Able To Control Mouse Through Thinking, Musk Say...

 7 months ago
source link: https://science.slashdot.org/story/24/02/20/1615216/neuralinks-first-human-patient-able-to-control-mouse-through-thinking-musk-says
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.
neoserver,ios ssh client

Neuralink's First Human Patient Able To Control Mouse Through Thinking, Musk Says

Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

binspamdupenotthebestofftopicslownewsdaystalestupid freshfunnyinsightfulinterestingmaybe offtopicflamebaittrollredundantoverrated insightfulinterestinginformativefunnyunderrated descriptive typodupeerror

Sign up for the Slashdot newsletter! OR check out the new Slashdot job board to browse remote jobs or jobs in your area

Do you develop on GitHub? You can keep using GitHub but automatically sync your GitHub releases to SourceForge quickly and easily with this tool so your projects have a backup location, and get your project in front of SourceForge's nearly 20 million monthly users. It takes less than a minute. Get new users downloading your project releases today!
×
The first human patient implanted with a brain-chip from Neuralink appears to have fully recovered and is able to control a computer mouse using their thoughts, the startup's founder Elon Musk said late on Monday. From a report: "Progress is good, and the patient seems to have made a full recovery, with no ill effects that we are aware of. Patient is able to move a mouse around the screen by just thinking," Musk said in a Spaces event on social media platform X. Musk said Neuralink was now trying to get as many mouse button clicks as possible from the patient. The firm successfully implanted a chip on its first human patient last month, after receiving approval for human trial recruitment in September.
        • Re:

          This one time in a highly prestigious but public place such as a court-house, a person on my team said good thing. A person we don't like from the other team said a bad thing in reply. Then they said a very bad thing. Then they said something even more bad, and this included buzzwords. But then a person on my team said good thing and a bad thing about the person on the other team and everyone clapped and cheered.
        • Re:

          I mean, if you had to choose between "bankrupted five casinos" and "started five new wars" would you choose the wars?

          You don't have to. Bobby may avoid assassination despite being refused Secret Service protection by his opponent and the LP will probably run somebody with ethics.

          Of course voting still isn't mandatory so supporting the system through compliance isn't required.

          There's never a need to vote for a scumbag and if you do you're morally culpable for his actions.

          • Re:

            Who started five wars, Reagan?

  • That settles it then. Whatever Musk say is the gospel truth, right?

    • Re:

      The killed all the primates... so are they going to release his name so we have a chance to keep track of his demise?

      • Re:

        Who is "The" and why did he/she/it kill all the primates?

        Is "The" another name for the propofol administered at the end of terminal procedures, where a specimen which had been preselected to be killed at the end of a procedure to study their brain is terminated?

    • Re:

      That settles it then. Whatever Musk say is the gospel truth, right?



      Yes, just like his "robot" which can fold clothes [forbes.com] or when he said the car was driving itself [arstechnica.com].



      It's all true because he said it's true. Just like Twitter is a "free speech" zone yet the thin-skinned carp keeps suspending accounts exercising that "free speech", such as the one which figured out he had a bot account praising his own tweets [dailydot.com]. That account was suspended on Sunday and the owner has since deleted his entire account not on

  • Musk said Neuralink was now trying to get as many mouse button clicks as possible from the patient.

    I understand X is doing badly and needs ad revenue, but this crosses a line.

    • Re:

      so matrix style click farm. got it.

      • Re:

        Morpheus got it wrong. He thought we were batteries, turned out we were ad and social media bots...

  • What interests me is the details, here.
    When he says "control mouse through thinking", does this mean that he thinks "Mouse go left" and it goes left? Or is it just hijacking a different function, as in "wiggle your left toe to move the mouse left".

    The whole thing is of course a massive achievement, but one option is far more glamorous than the other.

    • Re:

      These sorts of things - and I say that because this isn't unique work - generally involve the patient trying to visualize the goal, while a neural network that reads the signals from the brain learns to distinguish that signal from unrelated signals. In time, the wetware neural network (the brain) and the artificial neural network both home in on a more innate interaction.

      (The brain is extremely good at adopting new senses, prostheses, etc... it's not fundamentally limited to just those that humans are born

  • And when that rate becomes high enough and the MPOG blocks their account for running performance enhancing mods, they can just come back with an ADA lawsuit.

  • he didn't control the mouse, though, did he?

    he might have moved a cursor on the screen... still impressive, don't get me wrong, but it's not the same thing as controlling a computer mouse
    words, why do we even have them...

    • Re:

      No, they didn't telepathically cause the physical mouse to move. Is that what you were expecting, based on the summary? I mean, I'm generally on your side with this sort of stuff, words matter. But calling out this one seems to be leaning towards the pedantic side.

      FTA: "...adding that the initial goal is to enable people to control a computer cursor or keyboard using their thoughts."

      • Granted, TFA said "mouse cursor and keyboard" but that still had me thinking "a hardware button on a hardware keyboard will be depressed and un-depressed."

        Why would I think this?
        * With all the talk about brain-computer or brain-spine interfaces being used to control hand and other muscles, that seems like an obvious conclusion.
        * Even if it's not a "computer bridge" from brain-to-body, it would be very useful to have the computer-brain interface control a robotic hand that moved a mouse or typed. Not just f

    • Re:

      If they had rigged it to a robot moving a mouse, would have been equally as effective, but pointless, as it could have been as equally limiting and still described the same way.

      Were you perhaps looking for a demonstration that it is ready for controlling prostetic limbs in a more arbitrary capacity? I'm working to find your point here..

    • Re:

      Yeah but back then they didn’t use a massive sewing machine that went BBBBBRRRRRRRRRRRBBBBBPPPPPPPPP as it staples the implant into your jello.



      Progress!


About Joyk


Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK