Openness is a Red Herring, Lock-in is the Real Deal
source link: https://dirkriehle.com/2023/07/05/openness-is-a-red-herring-lock-in-is-the-real-deal/
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.
Openness is a Red Herring, Lock-in is the Real Deal
Posted on
If you are using Red Hat Enterprise Linux, it should be easy to switch to Suse Linux Enterprise Server, right? You’d do that if you disagree with Red Hat’s pricing and Suse provides a better deal. Sadly, a real-world calculation has to take the switching costs into account, because RHEL and SLES are not exactly drop-in replacements. There is a lot that needs reconfiguring and retooling and relearning. Hence switching costs create lock-in into a software, even if it is built from open source components.
Openness, in particular open source, is good, but not wholly sufficient for a (mostly) care free life. Open standards are good, but often could be better (in particular if deliberate holes have been negotiated in the standards to allow for proprietary innovation). Lock-in and the associated switching costs come in many forms, not just intellectual property lock-in.
Knowledge and skills lock-in can be as severe as IP lock-in. If you employed a consultant to build a one-off solution for you, would you easily switch to another consultant for some modification or addition, assuming they could do the same or better job? Probably not, you’ll only switch if there is a significant price difference (which is likely to be eaten up quickly by cost-overruns and sub-par quality when compared with the original consultant).
Again, open source is great, but it is too easy to think a particular type of license will fix it all. As you review your software dependencies and their costs, you should be calculating in switching and opportunity costs, not just license fees or lack thereof.
Comments
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Recommend
-
29
分享时间：...
-
10
Do We Need to Look for 5G Openness Beyond Open RAN? Is it time to look beyond Open RAN? That question may seem strange given all the positive developments, including
-
6
Openness and Interchangeability in Hosted Service Elements 5G specifications have addressed the growing interest in “alternative technologies” in networking, embracing things like NFV and (some say) SDN. What is less clear is how eff...
-
9
UN officials praise openness of Beijing 谢益辉 / 2005-11-12 这是一则好消息，难得遇见一次 UCLA 对中国的正面评论：） Geneva — The mainland has been honest with the international community about its late...
-
8
Threat Intelligence ...
-
7
News Intel Pledges Support for RISC-V and “Openness in Technology” 2 days ago by Jake Hertz A major player has joined the effor...
-
9
Making the case for openness as the engine of human progress Is "open" the future of human progress, as this recent book argues? Maybe. To know for sure, we'll n...
-
0
-
2
...
-
9
Memory Safety is a Red Herring Memory Safety is a Red Herring Home Blog 2023-12-21TL;...
About Joyk
Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK