The Hidden Costs of False Positives in Code Quality
source link: https://deepsource.com/blog/the-hidden-costs-of-false-positives-in-code-quality
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.
High false-positive rates in code quality tools can lead to several challenges for developers, such as longer differentiation time, lack of confidence in code reports, and confusion over standardization. This article discusses the consequences of these issues on software development processes and the need for streamlining the code quality process.
The False-Positive Dilemma:
A recent survey by DeepSource revealed that nearly half of the respondents identified "high false-positive rates" as a significant issue with their current code quality processes. When developers receive too many false-positive alerts from quality tools, they tend to dismiss them, eventually treating every alert as a false positive. This behavior undermines the benefits of static code analysis, causing developers to overlook severe issues and impeding the progress of producing better code from the onset.
Longer Differentiation Time:
High false-positive rates force developers to manually distinguish between real and false positives, requiring additional time and effort to identify and resolve discovered issues. This process involves manual and automated solutions, making it more time-consuming and inefficient.
Lack of Confidence in Code Reports:
Increased false positives in code analysis reports can lead developers to disregard questionable information. As a result, they might focus on perceived issues rather than actual problems, increasing the likelihood of overlooking critical issues.
Confusion over Standardization:
Developers often need to work on what constitutes a genuine problem, making it challenging to establish clear regulations for code quality. Even if they agree on flaws identified in one iteration, similar issues may reappear in future iterations, indicating a need for progress in improving code quality from the beginning.
Dealing with Linter Configurations:
Developers can adjust linter configurations to reduce false positives, but doing so across multiple linters with different settings is cumbersome and prone to human error. Additionally, some tools need more rules or consistency in setting updates, further emphasizing the need to streamline the code quality process.
High false-positive rates in code quality tools pose significant challenges for software developers, impacting their ability to efficiently identify and resolve issues, maintain confidence in code reports, and standardize code quality regulations. Streamlining the code quality process and addressing the false-positive dilemma is crucial for improving software development outcomes and producing high-quality code.
Download the full report today for more insight into how engineering and security leaders approach code quality and security in 2023.
Recommend
About Joyk
Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK