White House seeks information on tools used for automated employee surveillance
source link: https://www.computerworld.com/article/3694873/white-house-seeks-information-on-tools-used-for-automated-employee-surveillance.html
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.
White House seeks information on tools used for automated employee surveillance
The information will be used to ascertain if employers are violating antitrust and privacy laws, including whether companies use technologies to artificially reduce wages.
The White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) will soon release a public request for information (RFI) to learn more about the automated tools employers use to surveil, monitor, evaluate, and manage workers.
“Employers are increasingly investing in technologies that monitor and track workers, and making workplace decisions based on that information,” the OSTP announced in a blog on Monday. It said that while these technologies can benefit both workers and employers in some cases, they can also create serious risks to workers.
Responses to this RFI will be used to inform new policy responses, share relevant research, data, and findings with the public, and amplify best practices among employers, worker organizations, technology vendors, developers, and others in civil society, the OSTP said.
[ Related: Online privacy: Best browsers, settings, and tips ]
Those who are interested in providing details need to do so by June 15.
Upholding employees’ rights
Constant tracking of performance can pose a risk to employees’ safety and mental health, the OSTP said, pointing out that it could also lead to discrimination and stop employees from forming unions.
“Monitoring conversations can deter workers from exercising their rights to organize and collectively bargain with their employers. And, when paired with employer decisions about pay, discipline, and promotion, automated surveillance can lead to workers being treated differently or discriminated against,” the OSTP said.
Certain applications of these systems, when paired with decisions about working conditions, promotion, discipline, or termination, may also treat otherwise similar workers differently based on their race, ethnicity, gender, religion, age, national origin, health, disability, or other protected status.
“Some systems may also violate antitrust and privacy laws, for instance, if employers use technologies to artificially reduce wages,” the RFI said.
Increased automated tracking during the pandemic
The OSTP noted that the constant tracking of employees increased during the pandemic as the workforce became remote.
The percentage of large employers using AI tools to track their workforce may have doubled since the beginning of the pandemic to about 60%, according to research by Gartner. This surveillance is carried out either by having software on workers’ computers to dedicated electronic devices that workers wear or carry on their person.
Through the RFI, the administration aims to gather information on workers’ firsthand experiences with surveillance technologies; details from employers, technology developers, and vendors on how they develop, sell, and use these technologies; best practices for mitigating risks to workers; relevant data and research; and ideas for how the federal government should respond to any relevant risks and opportunities, the OSTP said.
Last year, the Biden administration released a blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights, which stated that individuals “should be free from unchecked surveillance.”
The blueprint also raised concerns over the possible harms of continuous surveillance on workers, using the example of electronic monitoring intended to prevent workers’ efforts to organize a labor union. The current RFI is an extension of the blueprint to further study the use of automated surveillance and management systems in the workplace.
Recommend
-
4
Regulatory Enforcement German laptop retailer fined $12.7M under GDPR for employee surveillance
-
14
-
10
Will the White House's New Push to Limit Chinese Surveillance Technology Impact TikTok? Published June 4, 2021 By
-
8
Facebook Seeks Oversight Board Advice on What Qualifies as 'Private' User Information Published June 15, 2021 By
-
4
More Remote Work Leads to More Employee SurveillanceLooking to ensure remote worker productivity, organizations are turning to AI and surveillance technology. But 10% of workers are expected to try to subvert those efforts.If you are...
-
6
White House Seeks More Power To Counter Use of Drones In US Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive
-
5
January 31, 2023 ...
-
5
U.S....
-
5
The House Intelligence Committee's Surveillance 'Reform' Bill is a Farce Earlier this week, both the House Committee on the Judiciary (HJC) and the House Permanent Sele...
-
4
Surveillance Fight Pits the White House Opposite Reproductive RightsProminent advocates for the rights of pregnant people are urging members of Congress to support legislation that would ban warran...
About Joyk
Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK