What's the Financial Impact of a 4-Day, 32-Hour Work Week
source link: https://spin.atomicobject.com/2022/10/22/32-hour-work-week/
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.
What’s the Financial Impact of a 4-Day, 32-Hour Work Week?
There’s been a lot of buzz recently around the idea of a four-day, 32-hour work week. The concept is to keep the same weekly pay, work fewer hours, and deliver the same output that you previously delivered in a 40-hour work week.
I’m curious to see how this concept plays out in reality. It’s interesting to reflect that we’re less than 100 years removed from Henry Ford announcing the five-day, 40-hour work week. Is there another shift coming?
Every organizational decision comes with pros and cons. There are some obvious pros and cons associated with this concept.
Pros:
- More individual time outside of work
- Recruiting and retention
- Marketing buzz
Cons:
- Less time for building relationships
- Pressure to deliver results faster
- Financial viability
This is certainly not an exhaustive list.
In this post, I’m only going to focus on the financial viability for a service company.
To demonstrate the financial impact, I’ve created two simplified, fictitious income statement models. One model will represent a five-day, 40-hour schedule, and the other represents a four-day, 32-hour schedule.
Assumptions
- We’re selling a fixed budget, scope-controlled billing model. It’s not a fixed-price model.
- The consultancy is currently charging a market rate for their work.
- Clients will expect the same output for the fee they are currently paying.
- In other words, clients won’t tolerate paying the same and getting less.
- Clients will demand to pay 20% less for four-day iterations (if you charge per iteration).
- Most clients won’t be willing to increase the hourly rate (if you charge per hour).
- The consultancy is paying a competitive salary for the team members.
- The SG&A team can complete their work in four days without adding capacity (additional salary).
- Billable utilization rates remain consistent for both four-day and five-day schedules.
- Expenses stay the same for both four-day and five-day schedules.
5-day, 40-hour Work Week Income Statement
Revenue | $10,000,000 | |
COGS (Cost of goods sold) | $6,000,000 | |
Gross Profit | $4,000,000 | 40% Gross Margin |
SG&A (Sales, general, and administrative) and operating expenses | $2,000,000 | |
Profit | $2,000,000 | 20% Net Margin |
4-day, 32-hour Work Week Income Statement
Revenue | $8,000,000 | 80% of 5-day Income Statement |
COGS | $6,000,000 | |
Gross Profit | $2,000,000 | 25% Gross Margin |
SG&A and operating expenses | $2,000,000 | |
Profit | $0 | 0% Net Margin |
Analysis
In the above example, the $2M reduction in revenue results in a full $2M reduction in profit. This happens because the cost structure remains the same.
Running a service firm with a low margin puts the organization at risk of small market fluctuations causing painful consequences (e.g. layoffs, aggressive cost-cutting, etc.). Running a firm with zero margin is not viable.
To regain the five-day margin using the four-day model, you’d need to increase your rate or service cost by 25% (since you only have four days to make five days of revenue).
There are a few legitimate ways to recover the lost margin. You could either prove to the market that you can deliver 25% more value in the same amount of time or provide a more valuable offering. Both options are difficult to achieve.
In a market that’s hungry for your services, clients might be willing to pay the premium. In that same scenario, I would expect the employees would also want an increase in pay since they’ll see their peers at other organizations getting it (i.e. competitive market pay).
It’s logical to assume that some of your competitors will not adopt the four-day model. In a more competitive business environment, the five-day firms will be in a stronger position to have lower rates and leverage their margin to win work.
Assuming the market needs your services, it’s fair to assume that the rates would naturally increase by 25% if all the supply in the marketplace changed to a four-day model.
Until then, it’s financially risky for service providers to be the first organizations to make the leap. Just as in the past, massive employers will need to be the ones that set the standard for the new normal.
Recommend
-
3
The 4-Hour Work Week by Timothy Ferriss(Work Less & Earn More = Live Smarter)My Credentials: — I am one one month and ten blogs old on Medium now. What I have earned, a...
-
6
Meteor Impact 2020 is this week!
-
11
A browser based, retro sandbox game that let's you see the impact of your financial decisions Money Simulator A browser based, retro sandbox game that let's you see the imp...
-
8
We’re All Paying for Someone Else’s 4-Hour Work Week, Not OursA lesson in “print capitalism”
-
5
Financial Service Week With Knoldus Inc. Reading Time: 2 minutes Knoldus is excited to announce the arrival of Financial S...
-
3
blog.cloudflare.com Checking if the site connection is secure
-
9
-
2
-
6
How does AI and model bias impact DEI in financial services and insurance? Answering the top questions By Neil Raden
-
3
...
About Joyk
Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK