0
Cross Project Council
source link: https://mtngs.io/openjs-foundation/cross-project-council/hvYlmCNEx0M.html
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.
OpenJS Foundation Cross Project Council, 13 Sep 2022 open meeting
And
we
are
live.
Great
welcome
everybody.
This
is
the
openjs
council
openjs
foundation,
cross
project
council
meeting
today
is
september.
13Th
2022,
I'm
filling
in
for
josephi.
It's
robin
again
got
a
smaller
crowd.
Today,
a
lot
of
folks
are
traveling
on
the
road
lots
of
things,
electron
collab
summit,
open
source
summit,
but
have
a
nice
group
here.
So,
um
let's
see
michael,
do
you
want
to
replace
those
notes?
You
just
um
in
chat
books,
add
their
themselves.
Yeah,
there's
the
link
people
and
add
themselves
to
the
agenda.
If
they
haven't
already
and
let's
get
through,
I
was
going
through
some
of
these
things
last
night
thanks
everyone
who
was
sort
of
making
updates
closing
things.
um
Okay,
let's
look
first
on
the
list
issue
923
clarify
the
voting
process.
I
believe
there
was
a
working
session
on
this
last
week.
Were
you
there,
michael?
I
was
traveling
for
a
conference.
No,
I
couldn't
make
it.
Okay,.
Nobody
else
I
think
we
are
all
gone.
um
I
did
officially
send
out
the
mail
with
our
news
cpc
voting,
reps
michael
jordan,
emily
and
toby
congrats
and
welcome
again
to
another
year
of
voting.
I
think
we're
looking
at
perhaps
simplifying
was
sort
of
the
theme
of
the
meeting
last
week
um
on
voting.
It's
still
a
little
complex,
even
for
those
of
us
who've
been
around
a
little
bit
so,
but
we'll
have
we'll
keep
working
on
that
as
we
move
along,
and
I
realized
we
missed
announcements,
but
I
think
we'll
capture
some
of
the
announcements
in
our
uh
in
our
issues.
Okay,
um
issue,
910,
add
patching
script
for
code
of
conduct,
modifications.
Seems
like
there's
some
uncertainty
among
various
folks
about
what
the
plan
is.
My
understanding
was
that
the
we
should
land
a
pr
with
the
changes
on
top
of
the
contributor
covenant,
along
with
a
tool
that
can
combine
them,
and
so
it
might
just
be
waiting
for
someone
to
write
that
tool.
But
I
I
don't
know
how
yeah
I
don't
know
if
that's
like
a
hard
requirement
or
if
that's
just
what
we
all
assume
is
going
to
happen.
Someone
writes
the
tool
or
yeah.
You're
saying
land
the
pr
with
the
contributor
covenant
once
you
open,
maybe
bring
it
up
in
an
issue
first
and.
Yeah
I'll
take
a
look
at
it
and
leave
a
comment
after
this
meeting.
Okay,
get
it
moving
all
right,
yeah.
I
think
you.
Have
a
like
in
the
issue,
you
have
a
concrete
list
of
steps
of
how
it
would
work.
Yeah,
I
remember
writing
something.
Like
that,
it's
basically
like
you
know
it's
it's
a
good
proposal,
so
it's
probably
like
you
said
waiting
on
somebody
to
actually
implement
anyone
watching.
Let
me
know
how
I
can
help
jordan.
Will
do.
Yeah
all
right,
okay
uh
issue,
908,
um
let's
see
openjs
world
2023
planning.
um
We
talked
uh
two
weeks
ago,
giving
you
all
an
update
that
we
don't
plan
on
having
our
standalone
sort
of
marquee
event.
We
will
have
a
smaller
summits
within
open,
js
world
and
then
adjacent
um
events
to
um
existing
either
linux
foundation,
events
or
what
I
call
third
party
events,
so,
whether
that's
like
a
no
compu
or
um
cascadia.js
or
friends
in
the
northwest.
So
um
what
I
would
really
love
for
everyone
to
do?
I
don't
know
if
we,
if
we
could
put
it
in
the
issue
that
would
be
great,
is
for
you
all
to
let
me
know
which
are
the
favorite,
your
favorite
javascript
events
that
you
like
to
attend,
or
what
are
the
popular
ones
in
various
parts
of
the
world,
because
we
do
need
to
start.
You
know
kind
of
finalizing
our
budget,
this
fall
for
2023,
and
then
I
want
to
work
with
the
organizers
to
see
how
we
can
help
bring
our
community
with
theirs.
If
everyone
has
a
wish
list,
and
maybe
I'll
prompt
folks
with
a
comment
on
that.
Might
be
worth
tweeting
something
out
from
the
foundation
account
being
something
like
we're.
Looking
for
we're
considering
events
to
partner
with.
Oh
good
idea.
Like
tell
us,
you
know,
go
to
this
issue
and
comment
with
you
know,
comment
or
upvote
your
favorite,
something
like
that.
Yeah
um
one
uh
one
thing
it
had:
we
don't
have
like
the
ink
drive
we're
partnering
with
the
finnos
foundation,
which
is
the
fintech
foundation
with
their
event
in
december,
8th
we're
just
looking
at
space
right
now
and
we're
putting
together
a
javascript
and
fintech
event
in
new
york
um
likely
on
the
same
day,
if
not
like
a
day,
two
or
a
day
zero.
So
if
that's
something
folks
are
interested
in,
but
yeah
we're
kind
of
working
out
that
what
space
parameters
we
have
and
then
we'll
uh
work
with
the
program
committee
to
curate
that
how
far
out
is
that
that's
not
very
far
out
it's
december,
8th?
Okay,
I
think
we
should
have
quite
a
bit
of
interest.
We
have
some
uh
financial
uh
banks,
um
members
other
folks
who
think
it's
important
in
that
space,
actually
they're,
just
actually
from
the
finnos
folks,
just
looking
for
some
of
our
maintainers
as
well
to
provide
more
updates
on
projects
so.
Yeah.
It
was
just.
Asking
this
that
that
sounds
like
a
very
interesting
one.
Unfortunately,
I'm
actually
on
vacation
that
week,
but.
Yeah
and
uh
one
of
the
finnos
leaders,
uh
james
mcleod,
actually
runs
the
javascript
meetups
in
london.
If
you
know
him
so
yeah
we're
excited
about
that
one.
They
actually
have
a
similar
event
in
london.
I
think
it's
in
june,
so
we'll
look
at
doing
that
in
june
next
year,
as
well.
I
think
it
adds
to
jordan's
suggestion,
like
not
just
asking
people
to
say
what
their
best
events
are,
but,
like
hey,
are
there
any
events
who
would
like
to
partner
with
us
because
yeah
yeah
yeah
right?
That
sounds
like
people.
Events
may
say:
hey
we're
a
good.
We
already
get
some
interest
so
hey.
Why
don't
you
come.
Great
okay.
uh
The
cp
we
the
next
two
uh
well
actually
the
next
one,
the
cpc
at
large
we
had
there
were
actually
sort
of
two
categories
that
was
uh
closed.
Actually,
I
should
update
the
issue,
but
what
I
had
just
commented
earlier
about
jordan
and
emily
are
at
large
and
toby
and
michael,
are
no.
I'm
kidding.
Michael,
I
think.
The
regular.
Are
the
regular
elected
by
the
regular
and
toby
or
amp
and
emily
have
their
projects?
That's
right,
all
right!
So
that's
close,
so
I
will
update
that
and
then
close
it.
Okay.
um
The
impact
voting
member
selection
um
again
we've
had
those
updates
just
want
to
give
you
all
a
heads
up.
Even
our
board
members.
We
have.
um
You
know
our
website's
a
little
glitchy
right
now,
but
we
do
have
a
ticket
in
to
fix
it.
So
we're
going
to
have
all
of
our
governance
section
updated
soon.
We're
also
going
to
be
updating.
Our
website
come
in
the
next
year,
so
hopefully
it
won't
be
so
glitchy
and
we
can
make
those
updates
in
real
time.
Okay,
sleeping
down
to
898
grace
hopper
conference,
uh
I
gave
a
quick
update
uh
last
night
we
posted
a
blog
this
morning.
uh
Sarah
chips
and
I
will
be
there
along
with
paula,
paul
from
our
board
and
other
community
folks,
but
we
have
a
lot
going
on
um
so
we
tweeted
today
um
and
we
have
a
blog
so
friday
we
have.
The
node.js
project
is
doing
a
hackathon
for
virtual
attendees.
There
are
15
000
virtual
attendees
registered
15
000
in
person
for
30
000
total.
We
do
unfortunately
have
to
cap
the
attendance
level
at
some
of
these
hackathons
and
workshops.
So
thanks
to
the
organizers
on
that,
we've
got
in
addition
to
the
note
hackathon,
I'm
doing
a
workshop
with
some
other
community
folks
on
essentially
how
the
falafel
gets
made
with
community
engagement,
we're
doing
a
mock
white
house
hearing
on
a
security
incident
with
a
chief
security
officer,
a
maintainer
foundation
leader
and
a
security
vendor.
So
we're
gonna
do
breakout
sessions
with
attendees
um
and
then
come
back
and
present
them
a
mock
white
house
hearing
on
security,
so
that'll
be
pretty
cool
um
yeah.
I
know
it'll
be
kind
of
fun.
I
am
actually
not
playing
a
foundation
leader.
I
am
playing
a
chief
information
security
officer,
so
so
cool
yeah,
it's
a
little
skeptical
on
open
source,
so
that'll
be
fun
um
and
then
next
week
we
have
our
linux
foundation.
Booth
uh
where
we
will
all
be
taking
shifts
um
so
that'll,
be
great
and
then
on
tuesday
evening
we're
having
um
an
open
source
happy
hour
that
we're
partnering
with
fannie
mae
on
and
if
you're
interested
in
coming
uh
hit
us
up
for
tickets,
because
space
is
limited,
but
it
will
be
a
lot
of
fun.
So
I
think
it
will
be
a
goosebump
moment
walking
onto
that
floor
at
grace.
Hopper
so
excited.
Let's
see,
let's
see
another
contributor
code
of
conduct,
should
we
sort
of
bookmark
that,
with
the
other
update
we
had,
it
seems
to
kind
of
keep
hitting
us.
Just
the
last
person
to
comment,
my
goodness.
I
see
tyranny
approving
with
the
condition
that
we
land
the
patches
I'll
block
you.
I
think
this
all
needs
to
be
cleaned
up
from
my
from
what
I
recall
two
weeks
ago.
That
way,
you
all
remember.
Yeah-
and
so
I
think
that
is
tied
up
with
the
first
one-
we
talked
about.
Basically,.
Waiting
for
someone
to
write
the
tool
and
then
land
that
pr
and
then
the
other
one
can
run.
Okay,
just
gonna
step
over
that
one.
A
focus
on
javascript
security
at
openjs
just
an
hour
before
this
meeting
we
had
our
security
uh
working
group
uh
meeting
um
we're
looking
at
you
know
doing
more
outreach
to
get
more
folks
to
attend.
We
had
michael
and
jordan
and
joe.
We
realized
that
time
zones
are
not
always
friendly
for
that.
So
I
know
that
joe's
going
to
be
doing
some
outreach
in
the
slack
channel
and
also
just
doing
some
more
async
kind
of
idea.
You
know
generators
on
journey
on
what
on
what
we
should
prioritize
and
when
we
can
meet
okay,
jordan,
you're,
muted,
jordan,
you're,
muted,
oh
you're,
just
oh
talking.
Someone
else
here,
co-worker
got
it,
but
um
just
on
an
update,
the
uh
node
uh
nodejs
has
a
open,
open,
sss
grant.
We
have
another
blog
going
out
in
the
next
day
or
two,
but
we're
doing
monthly
progress
reports
with
them
and
looking
at
areas
where
we
can
take
some
of
their
learnings
and
best
practices
and
apply
it
to
other
javascript
projects.
So
you'll
hear
more
about
that
on
the
security
security
group
and
also
in
our
blog.
License
check
support,
tooling,
michael.
I
did
reconnect
with
the
the
team
and
the
new
cto
for
the
linux
foundation
and
they
want
to
have
a
meeting
next
week
when
they're,
all
back.
If
you'd
like
to
join
jordan,
I
know
you
had
briefed
that
group
on
the
tool
you'd
written
so
I'd
love
to
loop.
You
in
on
that.
Yeah
that'd
be
great
sure.
Yeah
and
actually
I
think,
open
ssf
had
been
interested
in
something
similar.
So
that's
good
cool,
great.
um
I'm
gonna:
let's
see,
I'm
gonna
skip
the
coc
because
again
that's
looped
in.
Issue
761
build
stronger
ties
between
the
at-large
maintainers
and
their
cpc
reps.
I
know
there's
a
new
maintainer
channel
I've
seen
some
some
ideas
floating
through
michael.
I
know
you're
wanting
a
deck
that
I
owe
you
on
that's
specific
for
maintainers,
not
just
new
members,
so
we'll
get
that
going
soon
as
we're
stacked
up
would
be
close,
though.
Okay.
Okay,.
um
All
right,
this
is
a
new
issue.
657
update
docs
to
indicate
projects
can
use
the
icla
if
they
want.
Is
this
a
michael,
you
want
to
give
an
update.
ah
Did
I
comment
on
this?
One
all
right
did.
Is
this
a
new
one
that
you
opened,
because
I
thought
this
was
a
topic
of
word
discussion
about
two
years
ago
or
did?
Was
it
a
new
issue
that
we
folks
can
use
an
icla
or
a
ccla,
a
corporate
or
an
individual
cla.
Yeah,
I
guess
this
was
13
years
ago.
And
it
landed
on
our
agenda
today.
I
don't
know
how.
Let's
see
well
toby
added
it
to
the
agenda
five
days
ago.
Oh
maybe.
Just
how
it
ended
up.
So
he
tagged
it
with
the
agenda
tag
so.
That's
why
that's
why
it's
on.
Now,
okay,
it
sounds
like
you
know.
If
we
look
at
the
issue
well,.
Okay,
the
ip
policy
guidance
is
moved
it,
it
looks
like
it
might
have
landed
in
the
ip
policy
guidance,
but
not
necessarily
on
the
website.
There
were
two
parts
there,
so
where's
our
ip
policy
guidance.
I
suspect
the
ad
is
to
say:
hey,
are
we
done.
I'm
or
looking
if
I
can
find
the
ip
policy
guidance
yeah,
it's
not
brian
who's,
maybe
updated,
but.
Toby
must
have
just
added
it
so
that
we
were
reminded
that
it
was
still
there
yeah.
I
can
find
the
pod,
the
ip
policy
guidance
cla.
Right
so
I
see
that
that's
actually
updated
to
say
you
can
use
an
individual
cla
by
itself
for
both
the
individual
cla
and
the
corporation
for
the
review.
Yeah.
So
that's
checked,
then
the
question
is
on
the
opengs
website.
It's.
On
there
he
has
a
link
to
it.
The
openjs
foundation
clan
has
both.
Maybe
it
was
just
a
typo
agenda
ad.
I
think
it
also
says
or
just
an
individual
cla,
so
I
think.
I
think
that
says,
like
I'm
reading
it
basically
says
project
maintainers
may
choose
to
use
the
dco
signup
process,
an
individual
cla
and
a
corporate
cla
or
just
an
individual
cla,
which
I
think
is.
I
think
we
can
just
check
this
and
close
it
yeah.
Yeah.
Okay,.
Awesome.
Okay,.
All
right.
That's
it
for
issues
looking
through
the
prs.
We
do
have
you
know
one
of
the
things
I'm
looking
through,
um
that
I
end
up
writing
an
email
several
times,
because
their
documentation
is
bad
as
issue
seven
or
pr
759.
um
I
think
if
we're
gonna
make
one
update,
it's
just
streamlining
the
process
for
our
community
fund.
You
know
right
now
we're
doing
the
reimbursements,
which
is
fine.
I
think
the
vision
was
to
have
it
go
through
the
community
fund,
so
that
would
sort
of
be
self-automated.
I
don't
know
if
it's
faster
about
the
saying
we
try
to
reimburse
folks
within
two
weeks,
but
our
documentation
is
actually
wrong
on
the
community
fund.
It
says:
go
to
lfx.
So
but
the
issue
with
lfx
is:
we
need
to
have
a
non-open
js
foundation,
employee
responsible
for
that,
so
you
we
still
have
the
process
the
pr
process,
I
think
which
is
great
because
it's
transparent
and
you
get
eyes
on
it
to
have
it
go
through.
But
once
somebody
um
asks
for
the
actual
reimbursement
on
the
um
it
just
comes
through
us
with
the
details.
It
doesn't
go
to
lfx.
Right,
I
think
yeah
that
would
be
my
question
on
this
is,
is
it
ready
you
know,
are
the?
Is
the
opengs
staff
ready
to
manage
it
through
the
lfx
and
the
others.
Yeah
yeah,
we
would
be
it's
all:
it's
all
plugged
and
wired
in
through
our
finance.
So
that's
fine
and
easy.
We
would
just
move
more
budget
there.
I
think
we
just
put
fifty
dollars
in
just
as
a
a
placeholder,
but
you
know
the
uh
cpc
has
its
own
budget
to
manage
for
scholarships
travel
and
a
thank
you
program
for
some
of
the
ideas
but
again
to
to
hit
the
approval
button.
It's
almost
like
open,
collective
right.
You
need
a
you,
need
somebody
from
the
community
to
hit
to
have
that
authority
and
approval.
Not
us.
I'd
suggest.
Perhaps
asking
if
the
chair
of
the
seat?
Yes.
Since
he's
not
here,
yeah.
I
I
mean
volunteer.
Volunteers.
We've
talked
about
one
to
manage
funds
from
the
bug
bounty
program
and
that's
the
exact
question
I
got
like
as
the
chair.
Would
I
be
willing
to
be
the
final
button
pusher
and
I
said
okay,
so
I
think
maybe
like
so.
I
think
that
that,
like
the
the
chair
being
the
one
who
says
yeah,
okay,
I
see
who
needed
to
approved
it
approved
it.
You're
gonna
push
the
button
to
pay
that
that
makes
some
sense
in
this
proposal.
The
other
thing
it
proposes
is
a
separate
budget
committee
than
what
currently
is
done.
Currently,
it's,
like
you
know
all
cpc,
members
lgtm
the
issue
and
eventually
gets
approved,
so
somebody
would
have
to
set
up
you
know
in
its
current
form,
somebody
would
have
to
set
up
a
budget
committee,
get
people
and
agree
get
everybody
to
agree.
If,
if
you
took
that
out
of
that
out
of
here
and
left
it
with
the
cpc
approves
as
we
do
today
and
the
chair
was
willing
to
be
the
final
button-
pusher
you,
it
might
be
landable.
Yeah
and
uh
I
have
examples
of
people's
prs
because
you
don't
have
to
like
divulge
your
entire
personal
information
itinerary
on
a
pr
on
your
travel,
so
it's
just
kind
of
a
little
high
level,
so
I'd
like
to
maybe
create
like
a
template
for
that
too,
using
some
of
the
other
submissions,
but
I
think
that
would,
as
travel
is
really
heating
up.
That's
the
one
area.
I
think
that
we
can
make
a
difference
in
streamlining,
so,
okay
I'll
talk
to
joe
about
it
um
and
maybe
work
on
the
dots.
Joe
button
pusher
is
that
we're
going
to
call
him.
Chair
the
chair
button,
pusher
like
when
you,
when
you
run
for
the
chair
ship,
this
is
one
of
the
things
you
take
on
is
kind
of,
but
the
other
thing
you
might
want
to
look
at
is
whether
you
want
to
update
that
proposal
to
keep
the
budget
committee
or
eliminate
the
budget
committee,
because,
oh.
Right
right
and
what
the
budget
committee
has
written.
There
you're
going
to
need
to
get
people
to
be
the
budget
committee.
What
do
you
all
think
about
that.
Or
do
we
need
a
separate
subcommittee?
This
is
the
cpc
seems,
I
don't
think
so.
I
don't
think
we
need
a
separate
committee.
Yeah
I
mean
how.
Many
decisions
would.
Like
which
decisions
would
they
be
making.
Like
how
much
do
you
allocate
for
scholarships
versus
travel
versus
thank
you
program,
but
like.
That
only
needs
to
be
allocated
if
we
run
into
a
case
where,
like
we
have
too
many
requests,
and
we
have
to
turn
some
down
in
order
to
have
money
for
something
else.
Has
that
been
a
problem
yet.
Has
not
been
a
problem
yet
I
can
see.
Through
something
in.
The
future,
as
we
grow
a
little
bit
we'll
see
but.
It
seems
like
something
we
should
just
keep
an
eye
on
and
don't
delay
the
bureaucracy
until
it's
helpful.
100
kind.
Of
what
I
was
going
to
agree
with,
like
it's
simpler
to
just
stick
with
the
approval
process
we've
been
using
for
travel,
people
are
already
doing
it
and,
as
a
second
step,
we
could
propose
something
bigger.
But
why
slow
ourselves
down
trying
to
figure
that
in
first.
Agree,
we
also
use
a
um
the
main
open
js
budget
as
well
for
scholarships
and
travel
as
well.
So
okay
sounds
good
to
me.
Cool.
Is
there
anything
else
on
that
pr
list
that
we
think
we
need
today.
I
know
we
still,
we
had
it
once
we
had
a
working
session
on
just
cleaning
up
and
doing
kind
of
like
a
filing
and
documentation
things
like
that.
I
think
we
made
a
dent
that
day,
but
we
definitely
need
more
of
that.
Cool,
I
think,
we're
covered
on
issues
and
pr's,
I'm
trying
to
think
of
any
other
announcements.
I
think
we've
hit
the
announcements
uh
rolling
in
to
our
issues.
um
Does
anybody
else
have
any
announcements
I
could
have
missed.
I
guess
upcoming
collaborator
summit.
The
collaborator
summits-
that's
right:
um
we
have
the
open.js
collab
summit
in
dublin
saturday,
sunday
october
1st
and
2nd
that's
adjacent
to
nodecompu
in
september
22nd
23rd.
We
have
the
opengs
open,
visualization
collab
summit
in
madrid,
thanks
to
carto
for
hosting
that
thank
you
red
hat
for
hosting
the
collab
summit
in
dublin.
So
those
two
are
going
quite
well,
I'm
excited
for
those
groups
and
some
of
the
ideas
they
come
up
with.
I
think
you
had
lots
of
really
robust
discussions
in
austin
this
last
year,
right
yeah,.
It
went
it
was
we
had
lots
of,
I
think
lots
of
people,
some
really
good
discussions
and
looking
forward
to
doing
doing
it
again,
you
know
probably
with
a
different
group,
because
it's
you
know
in
europe,
so
it's
nice
to
be
able
to
have
one,
that's
close
to
the
different
locales,
and
so
it
should
be
should
be
great.
Yeah
we
want
to
do
more
of
those
too
so
great
having
them
come
company
hosted,
works
well
as
well
from
an
agility
and
it's
nice,
because
then
we
meet
new
friendly
faces
from
those
companies
in
those
countries.
So
that's
pretty
cool
so
great!
Well,
that's
all!
I
have
today
gang
anyone
else.
Sarah,
I
will
see
you
in
orlando,
see
you
next
week,
yeah
I'm
excited
you're
excited
yeah,
jordan.
Your
daughter's
finished
with
your
masterpiece
today,
painting.
uh
She's
painted
two,
in
fact,.
Awesome
amazing,
good,
very
cool.
All
right,
yeah
have
a
great
day,
bye.
Thanks
everybody.
Thank
you.
Recommend
About Joyk
Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK