COMPFEST 14 Preliminary — Editorial
source link: http://codeforces.com/blog/entry/106567
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.
1725A. Accumulation of Dominoes
Author: Pyqe
Developer: nandonathaniel
Editorialist: Pyqe
1725B. Basketball Together
Author: FerdiHS
Developer: muhammadhasan01
Editorialist: Pyqe
1725C. Circular Mirror
Author: Pyqe
Developer: steven.novaryo
Editorialist: steven.novaryo
1725D. Deducing Sortability
Author: Pyqe
Developer: TakeMe, Pyqe
Editorialist: Pyqe
1725E. Electrical Efficiency
Author: steven.novaryo
Developer: steven.novaryo
Editorialist: rama_pang
1725F. Field Photography
Author: Pyqe
Developer: Pyqe
Editorialist: Pyqe
1725G. Garage
Author: Nyse
Developer: Nyse
Editorialist: Pyqe
1725H. Hot Black Hot White
Author: Pyqe
Developer: steven.novaryo
Editorialist: steven.novaryo
1725I. Imitating the Key Tree
Author: Pyqe
Developer: Pyqe
Editorialist: Pyqe
1725J. Journey
Author: gansus
Developer: gansus, steven.novaryo
Editorialist: rama_pang
1725K. Kingdom of Criticism
Author: Pyqe
Developer: Pyqe
Editorialist: rama_pang
1725L. Lemper Cooking Competition
Author: Pyqe
Developer: steven.novaryo
Editorialist: rama_pang
1725M. Moving Both Hands
Author: Pyqe
Developer: Pyqe
Editorialist: rama_pang
Fast tutorial. Thanks. Btw there is two pointers solution in B. Adding two pointers tag would be great I guess. |
2 days ago, # | How can you get 4 + (n * 4 — 3) / 3 just by 4 + 4a? |
2 days ago, # | i did'nt got solution for problem m anyone pls help |
-
Run shortest path algorithm.
Change the direction of all edges.
Run shortest path algorithm.
-
more detailed? pls
-
You wanna find a point x that has min minway(1, x) + minway(p, x). Also, we change the direction of all edges, so now, minway(1, x) + minway(p, x) = minway(1, x) + minway(x, p'), where p' is a new point for p, that shows, that p' is p in graph with reversed edges. We can see, that every point on the shortest way from 1 to p' has min sum of that 2 ways.
-
-
For E, what's the intended way to build the auxiliary tree? We used small to large merging but that was |
-
It is actually possible to build all sparse trees simultaneously using small-to-large, but the time complexity is worse. The intended solution uses an algorithm that runs in for each set . The algorithm is as follows:
- Sort the vertices in based on their euler tour traversal order.
- All extra vertices in the sparse tree can found as the of every pair of vertices in that are adjacent in the sorted order.
- Once all required vertices are found, we can find the edges by iterating the vertices (including the extra ones) in euler tour traversal order and maintaining a stack.
You can optimise it further to make the total time complexity . But the time limit is not that tight that even the small-to-large solution is able to pass.
44 hours ago, # | On the third task O() calculates in wrong way, min(Cntpair, m) = O(n), so O(n logn), or wthether we check case, where min(CntPair, m) = m, so in that way it'll be better if we say that it's O((n + min(n, m)) * logN) or something like that |
43 hours ago, # | L had weak testcases, we submitted L very late and only realized after the contest we forgot to check whether every element of the prefix sum was non negative and it passed the submission 170883681 |
42 hours ago, # | how M? |
42 hours ago, # | Problem: 1725B - Basketball Together Solution: 170864702 In this block of code:
when I set n = 1, D = 10^9, and a[i] = 1; in theory it should run in 10^9 steps, which will give a TLE verdict. But when I use "Custom Invocation" to test it, I found that it only ran in 500ms, which is way below the time limit. Why did it happen? Is it because of the codeforces judging machines, or is there something that I'm missing? |
-
It probably just runs that fast. The hot path only includes an add, a compare, and a conditional jump, which is < 3 cycles with branch prediction. Computers run at a few GHZ, so 500ms sounds right.
The things/second heuristic is just a heuristic for usualish groups of operations, you can do better if u have a fast loop body (especially if the compiler avx-ifies, which might be happening here).
To see exactly what is happening u can try putting it in https://godbolt.org/ with the correct compiler version/flags.
40 hours ago, # | Our team enjoy solving this problemset. Especially for Problem L. We didn't think it could be done using prefix sum. Very nice problem |
39 hours ago, # | why 1 and 4 cannot be expressed as |
-
we can write (b^2-a^2) as(b-a)*(b+a) // proof for 1 can not be expressed in terms of b^2-a^2 so the min positive value of a we can take is 1 and for b its 2 as (b>a) as stated in the problem so, (b-a)=1; (b+a)=3; and their multiplication would give us 3 as the min value which can be expressed in terms of b^2-a^2; and one more conclusion can be drawn is that after three all odd numbers can be expressed in the form of b^2-a^2 (because we can express every odd number (lets say a)as 1*a; and a can always be represented as a sum of 2 consecutive numbers which are always odd **** lest take a=4 ,b=5; b-a=1; b+a=9; 9*1=9; that is odd)
// proof for 4 cannot be expressed in terms of b^2-a^2 to make equation even we have to make (b-a) even first so in order to make that even min value of a we can take is 1 and for b is 3 so, (b-a)=2; (b+a)=4; and their multiplication will give us 8 that is the minimum even value we can achieve and from here we can draw one more conclusion that all the even values will be multiples of 4 as no matter what we take values of a and b whenever (b-a) is even (b+a) would also be even (because to make the diffrence of 2 numbers even their parity should be same and if we add same parity numbers then result is even) so that would make the result divisble by 4
For those curious about the formula for problem G (Garage): Spoiler |
-
I could come up with this result by building a sequence,
I added the difference between b^2 and a^2 in the sequence as follows:
4 — 1, 9 — 4, 16 — 9, 9 — 1, 25 — 16 ..
by listing the "difference between squares" in nondecreasing order,
I got the sequence:
3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 23, 24, 25, ,27, 28, 29, 31..
I noticed that the first number "3" doesn't follow the pattern, so I assumed it was a special case,
but the remaining numbers follow a consistent pattern that I came to figure out as:
"3 + 4 * (N // 3) + N % 3"
24 hours ago, # | Isn't F's TL too tight? |
18 hours ago, # | I think problem J has insufficient tests. In particular, I found solutions (including mine) that get AC, but give an incorrect answer to the following simple test:
As far as I understand, the correct answer here should be 106. |
10 hours ago, # | Could problem C be somehow solved by subtracting the configs with three same colours in the right angled triangle from rather than summing over bin. coefficients? |
Recommend
About Joyk
Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK