Experts warn no easy answer to how safe self-driving cars should be
source link: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/experts-warn-no-easy-answers-231756871.html
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.
Experts warn no easy answer to how safe self-driving cars should be
There is no easy answer as to how safe self-driving cars should be, an adviser to a new government-backed report has told the BBC.
The Centre for Data Ethics and Innovation (CDEI) report warns that it might not be enough for self-driving cars to be safer than human drivers.
It suggests the public may have much higher expectations of self-driving car safety.
This comes as the government details plans for self-driving cars.
These include a 'safety ambition' for vehicles: that they should be as safe as a competent human driver.
It says this will inform standards that need to be reached to 'self-drive' on the roads, and manufacturers could face sanctions if they are not met.
But the CDEI, an expert body which advises governments on artificial intelligence, says the question of how safe autonomous vehicles should be is not one science alone can answer.
It says the public may have little tolerance for crashes that are seen as the fault of "faceless technology companies or lax regulation" even if, it adds, on average driverless cars are safer than humans.
And if the public expect self-driving cars to be as safe as trains or planes, it would require a hundred-fold increase in average safety over manually driven cars, it warns.
"What we wanted to do was say there's not an easy answer to this question" said Professor Jack Stilgoe of University College London who advised the CDEI. He suggested that establishing how safe they should be was a democratic decision.
The CDEI says it is also important to consider how risk is distributed between different groups. Even if there are improvements in overall safety, "some groups may see substantial safety improvements while others see none or even face new hazards".
Biased drivers
The report advises that other risks will need scrutiny as the technology is rolled out.
One is the potential for bias in algorithms controlling the cars.
It warns that some groups, such as wheelchair users, may be underrepresented in data used to train the software algorithms which control the cars - potentially causing bias.
Recommend
-
9
NCSC claims smart cities are potential hacker targets Connected areas, also known as smart cities, use interconnected devices and sensors to increase service quality, such as configuring traffic lig...
-
9
Experts Warn of New Windows Shortcut Flaw – Krebs on SecurityResearchers have discovered a sophisticated new strain of malicious software that piggybacks on USB storage devices and leverages what appears to be a previously unknown security vu...
-
7
Experts Warn Fake Windows 11 Installer Is Using Malware To Steal Info ...
-
6
For Gen Z workers, it’s the ‘perfect time’ to leave a job, researcher says
-
5
Ransomware attacks drop 34% in Q2, but experts warn of potential ‘uptick’
-
7
Driverless cars: Experts warn no easy answer to how safe they should beBy Chris VallanceTechnology reporterPublished3 days ago
-
6
Nouriel Roubini, Sam Zell, Experts Warn on Fed Home...
-
6
Home ...
-
4
AI creators must study consciousness, experts warnPublished1 day ago
-
6
Tech Experts, Leaders Warn Of AI Extinction Risk
About Joyk
Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK