1

2 weeks of daily use, Base Midnight M2 MBA

 2 years ago
source link: https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/2-weeks-of-daily-use-base-midnight-m2-mba.2352980/
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.
neoserver,ios ssh client

2 weeks of daily use, Base Midnight M2 MBA

LucidityStudios

macrumors newbie

Original poster

Today marks 2 weeks of using my base model (8/256) M2 Midnight MBA.

I find it odd how much controversy there is over this laptop, and since I have the midnight, and the base model it seems I have the worst possible combination...

How is it doing after 9 full charge cycles, and daily use?

Pretty damn well.

No scuffs though it has been in and out of my bag dozens of times, and used like I would use any other computer...
Keyboard is noticeably softer than it was when new (I type a lot), but that is to be expected.

Shows fingerprints.. Yep. I wipe it down more than my space grey MBP, but it looks awesome to me. Black 90% of the time, looks blue under bright lighting, or outside. I can deal with the fingerprints for the color.

No chips, and yes before I posted this, I examined it closely. I have used the USBC ports a few times each day, but no chips. The sharp edges of the ports do look a bit brighter than the surrounding area, but they looked like that when I opened it up, so I think it is normal. Not noticeable unless you are looking for it.

Battery life is awesome.

No slowdowns or beachballs. None. No problems with getting hot, or slowing down. True; I don't edit video on this notebook, it is for light mobile use. Web work, photo and raster editing, writing, basic normal computer use.

I do have a M1 16" MBP as my heavy lifting computer. Though I have hardly used it these past two weeks. I just grab the MBA, and haven't needed to do any video editing these 2 weeks. If I did need to edit video, I would use the MBP because I need the storage for the files and yeah, the 16" screen is much nicer to edit on.

I think the SSD issue is way overblown, I loaded it up as hard as I could just to get it to swap to the SSD, and still felt responsive and absolutely normal while editing photos and doing web editing work. In normal use I would never have 30 tabs open, and every program on the computer running, but it handled the load just fine.

As this is for when I am out and about, I don't need the larger storage capacity. I have 120gb free, and if I need to access more, I can pull off my NAS over the web. Why pay for more storage I won't need?

I did upgrade the 16" MBP to 1TB because I knew I would need to edit large video files, but that is always done at home, or at a desk somewhere...so no need for it on my run-around computer.

Its a great computer.

I do have 2 complaints, and that is the base price. Should have been $999 Apple could have done that no problem and still had healthy profit margins. Also I would have liked a 12" screen option, as I miss the 12" MacBook format.

For perspective:

I bought the original MBA for $1800 in 2008?, and this computer is 500 times better than that computer... (it was verrrry slow)
I bought the second generation 12" MacBook for about $1500? (can't remember the cost exactly) , and used it as my run-around last year, this is 100 times better than that computer. (slow, and keyboard problems)

So I suppose $1200 isn't a terrible price, but yeah should have been $999

I am flying out of the US on Sunday for 8 days. I would not have taken the 16" MBP, as it is just too heavy to keep with me all the time, but I am certainly taking the M2.

Have fun everyone.

About Joyk


Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK