4
Stream.toList()和Collectors.toList()的性能比较
source link: https://blog.didispace.com/streamtolist-vs-collectorstolist/
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.
Stream.toList()和Collectors.toList()的性能比较
昨天给大家介绍了Java 16中的Stream增强，可以直接通过toList()来转换成List。
主要涉及下面这几种转换方式：
list.stream().toList();
list.stream().collect(Collectors.toList());
list.stream().collect(Collectors.toUnmodifiableList());
然后，看到有网友评论问：Stream.toList()和Collectors.toList()的区别是什么？哪个性能好？
处理结果的区别，其实上一篇文章和视频里都有说：
Stream.toList()返回的List是不可变List，不能增删改Collectors.toList()返回的是个普通的List，可以增删改Collectors.toUnmodifiableList()返回的List是不可变List，不能增删改
而至于性能的话，今天我们就来测试一下，看看哪个性能更好。
@BenchmarkMode(Mode.All)
@Fork(1)
@State(Scope.Thread)
@Warmup(iterations = 20, time = 1, batchSize = 10000)
@Measurement(iterations = 20, time = 1, batchSize = 10000)
public class BenchmarkStreamToList {
@Benchmark
public List<Integer> streamToList() {
return IntStream.range(1, 1000).boxed().toList();
}
@Benchmark
public List<Integer> collectorsToList() {
return IntStream.range(1, 1000).boxed().collect(Collectors.toList());
}
@Benchmark
public List<Integer> streamToList() {
return IntStream.range(1, 1000).boxed().toList();
}
}
结果报告：
Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList thrpt 20 24.422 ± 0.268 ops/s
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList thrpt 20 22.784 ± 0.599 ops/s
BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList thrpt 20 31.779 ± 1.732 ops/s
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList avgt 20 0.045 ± 0.006 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList avgt 20 0.062 ± 0.035 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList avgt 20 0.040 ± 0.028 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList sample 445 0.046 ± 0.002 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList:collectorsToList·p0.00 sample 0.039 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList:collectorsToList·p0.50 sample 0.041 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList:collectorsToList·p0.90 sample 0.057 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList:collectorsToList·p0.95 sample 0.073 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList:collectorsToList·p0.99 sample 0.102 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList:collectorsToList·p0.999 sample 0.150 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList:collectorsToList·p0.9999 sample 0.150 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList:collectorsToList·p1.00 sample 0.150 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList sample 460 0.044 ± 0.001 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList:collectorsToUnmodifiableList·p0.00 sample 0.042 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList:collectorsToUnmodifiableList·p0.50 sample 0.044 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList:collectorsToUnmodifiableList·p0.90 sample 0.046 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList:collectorsToUnmodifiableList·p0.95 sample 0.047 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList:collectorsToUnmodifiableList·p0.99 sample 0.051 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList:collectorsToUnmodifiableList·p0.999 sample 0.057 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList:collectorsToUnmodifiableList·p0.9999 sample 0.057 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList:collectorsToUnmodifiableList·p1.00 sample 0.057 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList sample 655 0.031 ± 0.001 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList:streamToList·p0.00 sample 0.030 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList:streamToList·p0.50 sample 0.031 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList:streamToList·p0.90 sample 0.032 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList:streamToList·p0.95 sample 0.033 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList:streamToList·p0.99 sample 0.035 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList:streamToList·p0.999 sample 0.037 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList:streamToList·p0.9999 sample 0.037 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList:streamToList·p1.00 sample 0.037 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList ss 20 0.043 ± 0.001 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList ss 20 0.045 ± 0.004 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList ss 20 0.031 ± 0.001 s/op
从报告中我们可以看到：
- 吞吐量：
streamToList>collectorsToList>collectorsToUnmodifiableList - 平均耗时：
streamToList>collectorsToList>collectorsToUnmodifiableList - p0.9999耗时：
streamToList>collectorsToUnmodifiableList>collectorsToList - 冷启动耗时：
streamToList>collectorsToList>collectorsToUnmodifiableList
所以，Stream.toList()的性能要各方面都要好于Collectors.toList()和Collectors.toUnmodifiableList()。
如果您学习过程中如遇困难？可以加入我们超高质量的技术交流群，参与交流与讨论，更好的学习与进步！
本文收录在了我正在连载的《Java新特性专栏》，该系列该用电子书的方式编写，如果想要沉浸式阅读学习的话，可以访问Web版本：https://www.didispace.com/java-features/
再放大一些数据量，试试：
@Benchmark
public List<Integer> streamToList() {
return IntStream.range(1, 10000).boxed().toList();
}
@Benchmark
public List<Integer> collectorsToList() {
return IntStream.range(1, 10000).boxed().collect(Collectors.toList());
}
@Benchmark
public List<Integer> streamToList() {
return IntStream.range(1, 10000).boxed().toList();
}
结果报告：
Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList thrpt 20 2.186 ± 0.162 ops/s
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList thrpt 20 2.184 ± 0.042 ops/s
BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList thrpt 20 3.538 ± 0.058 ops/s
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList avgt 20 0.426 ± 0.004 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList avgt 20 0.469 ± 0.016 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList avgt 20 0.293 ± 0.008 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList sample 58 0.448 ± 0.049 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList:collectorsToList·p0.00 sample 0.414 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList:collectorsToList·p0.50 sample 0.422 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList:collectorsToList·p0.90 sample 0.458 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList:collectorsToList·p0.95 sample 0.560 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList:collectorsToList·p0.99 sample 1.160 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList:collectorsToList·p0.999 sample 1.160 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList:collectorsToList·p0.9999 sample 1.160 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList:collectorsToList·p1.00 sample 1.160 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList sample 60 0.458 ± 0.004 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList:collectorsToUnmodifiableList·p0.00 sample 0.447 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList:collectorsToUnmodifiableList·p0.50 sample 0.455 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList:collectorsToUnmodifiableList·p0.90 sample 0.471 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList:collectorsToUnmodifiableList·p0.95 sample 0.482 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList:collectorsToUnmodifiableList·p0.99 sample 0.492 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList:collectorsToUnmodifiableList·p0.999 sample 0.492 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList:collectorsToUnmodifiableList·p0.9999 sample 0.492 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList:collectorsToUnmodifiableList·p1.00 sample 0.492 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList sample 78 0.293 ± 0.012 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList:streamToList·p0.00 sample 0.277 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList:streamToList·p0.50 sample 0.284 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList:streamToList·p0.90 sample 0.309 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList:streamToList·p0.95 sample 0.377 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList:streamToList·p0.99 sample 0.459 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList:streamToList·p0.999 sample 0.459 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList:streamToList·p0.9999 sample 0.459 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList:streamToList·p1.00 sample 0.459 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToList ss 20 0.474 ± 0.133 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.collectorsToUnmodifiableList ss 20 0.493 ± 0.099 s/op
BenchmarkStreamToList.streamToList ss 20 0.325 ± 0.056 s/op
从报告中我们可以看到
- 吞吐量：
streamToList>collectorsToList>collectorsToUnmodifiableList - 平均耗时：
streamToList>collectorsToList>collectorsToUnmodifiableList - p0.9999耗时：
streamToList>collectorsToUnmodifiableList>collectorsToList - 冷启动耗时：
streamToList>collectorsToList>collectorsToUnmodifiableList
所以，即使集合内的元素增大，Stream.toList()的性能在各方面依然都要好于Collectors下的方法。
好了，今天的分享就到这里，你学会了吗？
如果您学习过程中如遇困难？可以加入我们超高质量的技术交流群，参与交流与讨论，更好的学习与进步！
Recommend
About Joyk
Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK