Why more and more Div4?
source link: https://codeforces.com/blog/entry/102300?f0a28=1
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.
Well, it is meaningless
The comment is hidden because of too negative feedback, click here to view it |
The comment is hidden because of too negative feedback, click here to view it |
-
Meaningful as in gaining rating? Or as in learning new concepts? I feel like div 4s do not provide any interesting concepts that could help newbies/pupils unlike div 3s. Like solving problems with rating under 1300 wouldn't get you far as they are just simple observation greedy problems, and we already get enough of them from div 3s and the first three problems of div 2s, so having more div 4s would be somewhat redundant in terms of training/learning, but that's just my opinion ¯_(ツ)_/¯.
-
The comment is hidden because of too negative feedback, click here to view it
5 days ago, # | The comment is hidden because of too negative feedback, click here to view it |
-
i think cf should made more good div.1/2 instead div4, and for beginners, div3's difficulty is suitable.
-
i think cf should made more good div.1/2 instead div4
For the record, Mike himself has stated that the rate of Div 1s and 2s have nothing to do with the rate of Div 4s (they're literally made by different people!). Quote:
I'd like to repeat: Div. 3 and Div. 4 rounds doesn't affect the rate of Div. 1 and Div. 2 rounds. The coordinators focus only on Div. 1 and Div. 2 rounds. All Div3 (and future, if any, Div4) rounds are prepared without any help from the coordinators.
The implication is that just because there's no Div 4, doesn't mean there will magically be a Div 1 or 2. It's more likely there would just be no contest.
-
The comment is hidden because of too negative feedback, click here to view it
I'm with you on this one. There is no need for div 4 as div 3 was enough for absolute beginners. and div 4 is just the fastest finger first competition. And in my opinion, it would dishearten a lot of good programmers because they are good at pushing their limits in contests to solve more difficult problems and are not just typing masters. Div 4 is good but doesn't feel like a codeforces round. It feels different from all other contests. |
4 days ago, # | I usually can't solve a single problem on divs 1 through 3, but managed to solve problem A of the most recent div 4. Solving a problem on any contest really motivates beginners like myself when compared to getting a 0, and I'm finally able to have a proper rating. |
4 days ago, # | Number of (newbies+pupils) is very large and as a result solving more problem in a single contest will boost their confidence. If it doesn't change the rate of div 1,2 then it is good. |
-
cf rating's function is reflecting your real ability, but not to gaining your confidence
-
But is there not perhaps something to be gained by giving the very many people in that rating bracket the opportunity to solve more than just problems A and B in a contest? The reality is that a Div 2 contest will usually have an 800, maybe a 1000-1100, then perhaps something 1500+ as problem C. In Global Rounds usually half the problems are inaccessible to people below GM.
Div 4 provides a platform for people in the lower brackets to solve multiple problems in the region of 1200 to 1500 in a contest environment. I think if it has been confirmed that there is no impact on the number of Div 1 and Div 2 contests then there can be no possible reason to complain about allowing people the chance to do that — it has no material impact on someone of a high rating.
-
But it made cf rating more unreal
-
I don't really understand why people think this way... If I'm doing a contest, unless I'm doing it to win (which is unrealistic for my skill level) I do it because I expect to have fun challenging myself.
Spending half of the contest solving problems that I already know how to solve is the opposite of that and extremely boring. In fact, I think when I was purple and could only solve A and B, contests were more fun as I would quickly reach C and go "oh this is an interesting problem, let's think about it!" (I also disagree with the clarification of such problems as "inaccessible": a specialist solved H in the last global round, for example, and none of the previous problems required specialized knowledge.)
Speaking of which, can we get div1 rounds with fewer problems so I can start struggling quicker, please? :)
-
Who’s to say they already know how to solve them? That’s the whole point — they’re in a range where for this user group they may or may not be things they already know; there are merits to both. Either you’re putting into practice your knowledge or you’re learning new material. That means that lots of problems fall precisely into that bracket of “oh this is an interesting problem, let’s think about it” for the target audience of Div 4 contests. 14% of rated candidates scored a full house on the last Div 4 contest. Perhaps that is slightly high but it suggests to me that at least 86% of candidates found something that challenged them, and probably a chunk of those who managed the perfect score too.
As for a specialist solving H, obviously sometimes anomalous things happen. If you’re judging things on sample sizes of one then I can tell you some other pretty crazy stuff. I’m talking about for the overwhelming majority of people, and I think you know that.
-
-
-
4 days ago, # | i also want more div2/div1 round rather than more div3/div4. |
4 days ago, # | It's just fun. |
4 days ago, # | From the comments so far, it seems that the only one opposing it has a rating of 1400+ (unrated). As far as the frequency, there have only been two so far (two-year gap), and another one is coming soon. I think it's pretty early to judge Div. 4 as a whole, as it may change after a few more rounds. However, I agree with some of the comments that it is perhaps a bit too easy (first few questions), even for newbies that sometimes fail to solve 1-2 problems in Div. 3 (myself). I think most greens would be able to solve all the current Div. 4 problems, which is strange as often where there is a cut-off, say expert in Div. 3, not all 1600 and below solve everything. I will end this by saying that I trust and appreciate the efforts of Mike and the problem setters for Div. 4 as I personally enjoy the problems from C onwards as they have the right amount of difficulty for me as it currently stands. |
4 days ago, # | Thanks for downvoting my comment. Feel free to downvote more and more. It will only improve my awareness and get me stronger. |
4 days ago, # | Why do you mind? I would recommend those rounds to all the beginners. If you just learned Python or C++, it's a great practice and it exposes you to algorithmic thinking. An average programmer doesn't even know gcd or time complexity. If you want to show them CP, such div4 rounds are a great start. |
4 days ago, # | I think that Div4 should be prepared from recycled problems in the problem set, for people with rating below 1200. In addition, to make cheating less rewarding, you won't be able to surpass 1300 after a Div4 round. Div4 rounds will be trivial to make and therefore won't interfere with the more important Div1 and combined rounds. |
3 days ago, # | I agree with you on this. I feel that div 4 is too easy, and it doesn't give beginners a lot of improvement in their problem solving skills. I think the reason why people like div 4 is because it is for gaining some meaningless points, which I have learned doesn't help at all. Improvement is way more important than some meaningless rating, and eventually rating will go up through practice and contests. Div 3 is way more suitable for improvement at its difficulty. |
3 days ago, # | more and more people register new accounts for the purpose of narcissism, and pass all problem in little time. I think it is not good for newbie. |
3 days ago, # | The comment is hidden because of too negative feedback, click here to view it |
-
I want to say, div4's rating is UNREAL
-
The comment is hidden because of too negative feedback, click here to view it
-
But the Div4 in 2020 is suitable, I think current div4 is like to become easier and easier
-
-
3 days ago, # | Imagine div.4 as more like a drilling exercise rather than something for learning new things. greys and greens are most likely very new to competitive programming and still needs more easier problems to get used to typing code and learning patterns of easy problems. Div.3 could do as well but problems rated >1400 would already be too hard for newbies |
3 days ago, # | Codeforces became noobforces |
3 days ago, # | BTW why doesn't you participate in Div1 with your MatrixCascade_qwq account ? (I could easily identify it from the code you submitted) It is too silly for a Redcoder who don't participate in Div1 to complain about the increase in Div4. |
-
Since his manipulation of information makes me appear to be wrong (unnaturally many downvotes), I leave here the 99.9% obvious evidence.
The bidirectional evidence below shows that they are the same person's accounts.
It took me about 5 minutes to realize it (really easy).[Evidence 1] Accounts relevance through local settings (header)
Evidence 1 shows the relevance of the direction from SyadouHayami to MatrixCascade_qwq.
SyadouHayami
https://codeforces.com/contest/1614/submission/136989949 (2021-11-26 14:17:14)
-> MatrixCascade AFO is written first.
https://codeforces.com/contest/1613/submission/137700960 (2021-12-01 19:26:53)
-> qwq is written first.Of course, these are weak evidences. So I checked the submissions by MatrixCascade_qwq.
As a result, I am convinced that it is the same person. see Evidence 2.[Evidence 2] Exactly the same code
Evidence 2 shows the relevance of the direction from MatrixCascade_qwq to SyadouHayami.
These are submissions for the exact same problems.
SyadouHayami
[1637A-37] https://codeforces.com/contest/1637/submission/146071653 (2022-02-12 17:38:05)
[1637B-37] https://codeforces.com/contest/1637/submission/146076405 (2022-02-12 17:41:13)
[1637C-37] https://codeforces.com/contest/1637/submission/146092799 (2022-02-12 17:59:25)
[1637D-37] https://codeforces.com/contest/1637/submission/146088171 (2022-02-12 17:53:12)MatrixCascade_qwq
[1637A-37] https://codeforces.com/contest/1637/submission/146186146 (2022-02-13 05:25:03)
[1637B-37] https://codeforces.com/contest/1637/submission/146186158 (2022-02-13 05:25:17)
[1637C-37] https://codeforces.com/contest/1637/submission/146186166 (2022-02-13 05:25:32)
[1637D-37] https://codeforces.com/contest/1637/submission/146186176 (2022-02-13 05:25:46)It's obviously been copied and pasted.
There is no motivation for anyone to bother doing this, except for the same person.
3 days ago, # | Why not? |
27 hours ago, # | I think it is wise not to trust the upvotes/downvotes results here, as the information is being manipulated by his probably 50+ sub-accounts. In fact, the comment where I pointed out the existence of his other account had 30+ upvotes yesterday at most, but now it is -7 due to his criminal activity. The remaining 3 comments had a few upvotes yesterday, but are now close to -50. I also received troublesome DMs. Wise people will be easily convinced that this situation was caused solely by him. It is easy to see how he overreacted to being told the truth. I'm tired of this and I'm going to have a good time solving problems. Good bye! |
Recommend
About Joyk
Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK