2

China Hopes To Redirect a Nearby Asteroid Within the Next Four Years

 2 years ago
source link: https://science.slashdot.org/story/22/04/25/1751206/china-hopes-to-redirect-a-nearby-asteroid-within-the-next-four-years
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.
neoserver,ios ssh client

China Hopes To Redirect a Nearby Asteroid Within the Next Four Years

Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

binspamdupenotthebestofftopicslownewsdaystalestupid

freshfunnyinsightfulinterestingmaybe

offtopicflamebaittrollredundantoverrated

insightfulinterestinginformativefunnyunderrated

descriptive

typodupeerror

Do you develop on GitHub? You can keep using GitHub but automatically sync your GitHub releases to SourceForge quickly and easily with this tool so your projects have a backup location, and get your project in front of SourceForge's nearly 30 million monthly users. It takes less than a minute. Get new users downloading your project releases today!
×
The global effort to protect Earth from dangerous asteroids is set to become stronger, as China has announced its intentions to test an asteroid redirect system as early as 2025. Reader InfiniteZero writes: Speaking to China Central Television on Sunday, Wu Yanhua, deputy head of the China National Space Administration (CNSA), described China's preliminary plans to embark on the planetary defense project, according to Chinese state-owned news agency Global Times. Wu's comments coincided with Space Day, an annual event that commemorates the 1970 launch of China's first satellite, Dongfanghong-1, in 1970. For the proposed test, Wu said a probe would closely survey a near-Earth object prior to smashing into it. Known as kinetic impaction, the idea is to alter the orbital trajectory of a threatening asteroid by directing a large, high-speed spacecraft into the object. NASA is currently running a similar test, known as the Double Asteroid Redirection Test, or DART, which seeks to deliberately crash a space probe into Dimorphos -- a tiny asteroid -- later this year.
  • The Moon is a Harsh Mistress: "What are we going to do, throw rocks at them?" "Yes."

    While it would be awesome if humans could steer asteroids away from the Earth, it would also imply that humans could steer asteroids toward the Earth, and that would be a lot less awesome. Can't have one without the other.

    • Re:

      The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress is such a great story by the way. Certainly one of, if not the best hard sci-fi story ever imho.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]

      • Re:

        Yea just dont listen to the audiobook on internet archive. On that one Lazarus Long sounds like Hank Hill. Otherwise not bad though.
      • Re:

        I heard years ago that it will be made into a movie.

        Whatever happened to that?

          • Re:

            There was an announcement seven years ago and then nothing.

            It appears that the project is dead or at least stalled. That is too bad since it would make a good movie.

      • The reliance on technology on par with a telephone switch board made the story a little weird. An updated version of the story would mostly work if it was video based instead of audio bug based. Maybe with some hand waving excuse that the Luna regolith would prevent WiFi from working so easily as it does in the real world and thus require tunnels and cables between the colonists.

    • Re:

      Steering asteroids toward Earth takes orders of magnitude more precision than steering them away from Earth, because the fraction of the universe comprising "not Earth" is a much part of the universe (and hence easier to hit). If you're off by a factor of two or three in steering an asteroid away from Earth, it still misses Earth. If you're steering it toward Earth, it's may or may not hit Earth, and may or may not hit the target on Earth you don't want it to hit.

    • Re:

      They have too many nuclear weapons for that to make a difference. Asteroids are much more expensive to move and the lead time is too long to be useful in war. They're also not hard to block either. Any asteroid small enough to divert towards a target is small enough to deflect, and anything too big to deflect is suicidal.

    • There's also this Larry Niven novel about invading space elephants [wikipedia.org]. The humans used nukes, the aliens space rocks.
    • Re:

      I doubt it will be a big problem. Spacecraft are obvious and easily tracked. Any kind of a redirect mission would be even easier to keep tabs on, and any redirecting has to be done years in advance. Also, your targeting is probably going to be good to +- a hemisphere or so. Nukes are easier.

      In the book they were chucking moon rock with a rail gun launcher. That's a lot faster, easier to target, and doesn't have handy rockets marking the trajectory.

  • It seems fitting to see this headline under the Musk Twitter announcement.

    >ducks

  • "Giant Meteor for President. Just end it already."

    I really do have a T-shirt that says that. Maybe China will accidentally fulfill the words found on at least one T-shirt. I've also made a mental note that if enough disaster movies are made, at least one of them will eventually "get it right."

    • Re:

      Either that, or the inherent perversity of the universe will note that every remotely plausible scenario (and several frankly impossible ones) have already been done to death, and so the world will end in a manner so ridiculous and inane that nobody ever even considered making a story about it.


About Joyk


Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK