5

Why Algorithms Are Called Algorithms, and How It All Goes Back to the Medieval P...

 2 years ago
source link: https://www.openculture.com/2022/04/why-algorithms-are-called-algorithms.html
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.

Why Algorithms Are Called Algorithms, and How It All Goes Back to the Medieval Persian Mathematician Muhammad al-Khwarizmi

in History, Math, Technology | April 12th, 2022 5 Comments

In recent decades, a medieval Persian word has come to prominence in English and other major world languages. Many of use it on a daily basis, often while regarding the concept to which it refers as essentially mysterious. The word is algorithm, whose roots go back to the ninth century in modern-day Greater Iran. There lived a polymath by the name of Muhammad ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi, whom we now remember for his achievements in geography, astronomy, and mathematics. In that last field, he was the first to define the principles of “reducing” and “balancing” equations, a subject all of us came to know in school as algebra (a name itself descended from the Arabic al-jabr, or “completion”).

Today, a good few of us have come to resent algorithms even more than algebra. This is perhaps because algorithms are most popularly associated with the deep, unseen workings of the internet, a system with ever increasing influence over the things we do, the information we receive, and even the people with whom we associate.

Provided sufficient data about us and the lives we lead, so we’re given to understand, these algorithms can make better decisions for us than we can make for ourselves. But what exactly are they? You can get one answer from “Why Algorithms Are Called Algorithms,” the BBC Ideas video at the top of the post.

For Western civilization, al-Khwarizmi’s most important book was Concerning the Hindu Art of Reckoning, which was translated into Latin three centuries after its composition. Al-Khwarizmi’s Latinized name “Algoritmi” gave rise to the word algorismus, which at first referred to the decimal number system and much later came to mean “a set of step-by-step rules for solving a problem.” It was Enigma codebreaker Alan Turing who “worked out how, in theory, a machine could follow algorithmic instructions and solve complex mathematics. This was the birth of the computer age.” Now, much further into the computer age, algorithms “are helping us to get from A to B, driving internet searches, making recommendations of things for us to buy, watch, or share.”

The algorithm giveth, but the algorithm also taketh away — or so it sometimes feels as we make our way deeper into the twenty-first century. In the other BBC Ideas video just above, Jon Stroud makes an investigation into both the nature and the current uses of this mathematical concept. The essential job of an algorithm, as the experts explain to him, is that of processing data, these days often in large quantities and of various kinds, and increasingly with the aid of sophisticated machine-learning processes. In making or influencing choices humans would once have handled themselves, algorithms do present a risk of “de-skilling” as we come to rely on their services. We all occasionally feel gratitude for the blessings those services send our way, just as we all occasionally blame them for our dissatisfactions — making the algorithm, in other words, into a thoroughly modern deity.

Related content:

Algorithms for Big Data: A Free Course from Harvard

Advanced Algorithms: A Free Course from Harvard University

This Is Your Kids’ Brains on Internet Algorithms: A Chilling Case Study Shows What’s Wrong with the Internet Today

The Problem with Facebook: “It’s Keeping Things From You”

The Complex Geometry of Islamic Art & Design: A Short Introduction

How Youtube’s Algorithm Turned an Obscure 1980s Japanese Song Into an Enormously Popular Hit: Discover Mariya Takeuchi’s “Plastic Love”

Based in Seoul, Colin Marshall writes and broadcasts on cities, language, and culture. His projects include the Substack newsletter Books on Cities, the book The Stateless City: a Walk through 21st-Century Los Angeles and the video series The City in Cinema. Follow him on Twitter at @colinmarshall or on Facebook.

by Colin Marshall | Permalink | Comments (5) |

Support Open Culture

We’re hoping to rely on our loyal readers rather than erratic ads. To support Open Culture’s educational mission, please consider making a donation. We accept PayPal, Venmo (@openculture), Patreon and Crypto! Please find all options here. We thank you!

Comments (5)
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
  • Seriously?!! The man wrote a book crediting Hindu scholars IN THE TITLE, and you decide he “invented” it? This is cultural appropriation at its most brazen. Al-Khwarizmi was a glorified translator, and compiled knowledge from India on mathematics, astrology et al. There is no such thing as “Hindu Arabic” numerals. It’s Indian numerals which are still in use to date in India over a thousand years. Just because the West “discovered” knowledge thru middle-eastern traders doesn’t make the latter the source. Ironically, the colonialists (especially Portuguese and Brits) did a door-to-door campaign in India finding and destroying millions of ancient manuscripts because educated and scientific minded Hindu’s would not convert unless they were tortured or made ignoramuses. Job well done.

  • TurkicScholar says:

    There is no need to be enraged. As you said, Al-Khwarizmi compiled the previous knowledge of Hindu, also Hellenistic, Hebrew, and Greek treatises, with the knowledge from Arabic and Persian studies, by adding his own original findings. Such is the scientific way of progression, as european scientists also improved upon these studies. You say it like he just translated a particular book and that was all. While this is not true, we also have to accept that our current scientific progress was achieved with a lot of cultures contributing to it. Also, thanks for the great article!

  • Jonathan J Crabtree says:

    OK, let’s check the official algorithm for multiplication, which, according to dictionaries, is AB equals A added to itself B times.* Yet that would mean one multiplied by one equals two! Algorithms without common sense are useless!

    Jonathan J Crabtree
    Elementary Mathematics Historian
    Melbourne Australia
    http://www.podometic.in
    http://www.jonathancrabtree.com
    @jcrabtree

    * E.g. https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/multiplication

  • Moodiji says:

    Yes Indian culture is number 1. Thats why everyone wants to escape to Christian countries. The cleanliness, the attitude towards woman and cow worship are to be admired. I am Indian and the only thing I find good about Indian culture are the family values and South Indian non-veg food. You sanghs will manufacture all sorts of stories about how India was the best and all the proof was destroyed by someone else. Very convenient isn’t it.

  • Boring Geek says:

    TurkicScholar 💯. Totally agree !! Brilliantly put !! Lovely write up & lovely article too . !!


About Joyk


Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK