Ask HN: What happened to Apple's self service repair program?
source link: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31014998
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.
Ask HN: What happened to Apple's self service repair program?
Ask HN: What happened to Apple's self service repair program? 54 points by adtac 3 hours ago | hide | past | favorite | 29 comments https://www.apple.com/ca/newsroom/2021/11/apple-announces-se...
This was announced in November 2021, but there hasn't been any development since. The cynic in me thinks this was just a PR move to quell EU right to repair regulations, but I really hope that's not the case.
Logistics likely takes time for all of this as well as the legal side of things. It's not as simple as "poof, self repair!" as much as Samsung and Google are making it seem with iFixit.
https://9to5mac.com/2022/04/08/what-happened-to-apples-new-s...
I am of the mind that self repair on a leased device will void agreements.
Some things are certainly great as a service, but it's bad for everything to go in that direction. I don't want an oxygen subscription.
And that's fine! As long as you stay within the bounds of the free plan, you can have ad-supported oxygen! Terms & Conditions apply.
This is probably substantially more efficient than each dwelling unit having its own kitchen, but unlikely to be desired by many these days.
College-life is often similar.
1: https://nypost.com/2022/04/13/apples-tim-cook-claims-anti-bi...
of course you know that is not what I was talking about, the "you will own nothing and like it" crowd which I assume you are a part of given your response never wants to debate the actual problems with that position instead they take hyperbolic positions designed to deflect
https://www.fudzilla.com/news/mobile/47872-cook-blames-users...
The current debate is thus over whether or not customer disgust with their declining ability to repair and upgrade their devices, and resultant lost sales, will do more harm to shareholder profits than lost sales due to people extending the lifetime of their devices by easily replacing batteries etc.
> "There had been a lot of such rot let loose in print and talk just about that time, and the excellent woman, living right in the rush of all that humbug, got carried off her feet. She talked about 'weaning those ignorant millions from their horrid ways', till, upon my word, she made me quite uncomfortable. I ventured to hint that the Company was run for profit."
As far as I know, corporations don't have fiduciary duties. Corporate officers, directors, and employees who act on behalf of the corporation, have fiduciary duties.
And those duties (in the US, as far as I understand it) amount to putting the company's interests above their own and making responsible, informed decisions. That doesn't necessarily mean putting the shareholders before the customers. Its a judgement left to the people acting on behalf of the corporation - as long as they can show that their decisions are reasonable and not made out of self-interest.
Edit to add: This is also the basis for Corporate [Social | Environmental] Responsibility. People with fiduciary duties can reasonably decide that it is in the interest of a corporation for it to behave in certain ways within some wider context, even when that behaviour is not directly profit- or advantage-seeking.
Lemon prices down this week? Quick! Stop manufacturing spoons! Buy lemon farms!
That’s obviously not true in the short or the long terms.
Recommend
About Joyk
Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK