5

Next-Gen Data Pipes With Kafka and K8s: Part 2 - DZone Big Data

 2 years ago
source link: https://dzone.com/articles/next-gen-data-pipes-with-spark-kafka-and-k8s-part-2
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.

Introduction 

In our previous article, we discussed two emerging options for building new-age data pipes using stream processing. One option leverages Apache Spark for stream processing and the other makes use of a Kafka-Kubernetes combination of any cloud platform for distributed computing. The first approach is reasonably popular, and a lot has already been written on it. However, the second option is catching up in the market as that is far less complex to set up and easier to maintain. Also, data-on-the-cloud is a natural outcome of the technological drivers that are prevailing in the market. So, this article will focus upon the second approach to see how it can be implemented in the different cloud environments.

Kafka-K8s Streaming Approach in Cloud

In this approach, if the number of partitions in the Kafka topic matches with the replication factor of the pods in the Kubernetes cluster, then the pods together form a consumer group and ensure all the advantages of distributed computing. It can be well depicted through the below equation:

No. of partition in a topic of Kafka Cluster = No. of replication factor for a pod in K8s Cluster

15694111-1625826869378.png

Figure 1: Speed Layer Implementation With Kafka + K8

The two most important components of this concept are i) data streaming service and ii) container management tool. In the open-source world, Apache Kafka and Kubernetes can easily be leveraged but as the cloud comes into the picture, the technology stack gets changed with various cloud-managed services for different cloud vendors. In AWS, for data streaming services, Kinesis or MSK can be used. For container management tools, ECS or EKS can be utilized. For newly developed solutions, a Kinesis and ECS combination is better whereas MSK and EKS is a combination best for the solution that is migrated from on-premise deployment. Comparisons between these two technology stacks are as follows: 

Topic ECS + Kinesis EKS + MSK Complexity Easy to use Relatively complex Provisioning Easy provisioning Relatively complex Migration Not very easy to migrate. Need specific migration scripts for migrating on-premises Kafka configuration to Kinesis and same applies to base Kubernetes to ECS migration. Since EKS and MSK are services wrapped over Kubernetes and Kafka, migration would be easy.  Scalability Serverless architecture, and hence scalability is not the user’s headache.  Need to specifically design for scalability Vendor lock-in Yes, built on Amazon’s proprietary technology No, purely built on opensource technology Video streaming Supported Not supported Native Kafka-K8s compatibility No native support as ECS and Kinesis are based on Amazon’s proprietary technology. Ensure native library support as Kubernetes and Kafka cluster can be built in AWS by using these services.

In Azure, data streaming service options are different. There are many ways by which Kafka cluster can be implemented on top of the cloud. They are as follows:

  • EventHub — Purely serverless azure service for message streaming.
  • Kafka on HDInsight — Kafka cluster can be created using HDInsight.
  • Kafka on AKS — Containerized Kafka cluster on top of AKS.
  • Confluent Cloud — A confluent Kafka service can be used for KSQL and Kafka Stream.

A Comparison between all the options is well depicted by the following table:

Topic Event Hub Kafka on AKS Confluent Cloud HDInsight Complexity Easy to use Relatively complex, K8s knowledge is required. Easy setup steps Easy setup Provisioning Easy  Relatively complex Easy  Easy  Migration Not very easy to migrate. Migrating on-premises Kafka to the event hub requires additional steps. Since using Kafka on top of existing AKS cluster, need to set up adapters. Relatively easy Easy steps Scalability Highly scalable  Highly scalable Highly scalable Highly scalable

As far as a container management tool is concerned, Azure offers AKS (Azure Kubernetes Service) which ensures all the benefits of the Kubernetes

In GCP, container engine and container registry are used as container management tools and there are also few options by which a Kafka cluster can be created and used as a streaming component. The options are as follows:

  • Confluent Cloud — It provides fully managed Apache Kafka as a service.
  • Pub-Sub — Messaging and ingestion for event-driven systems and stream analytics.

Implementation of Kafka-K8s Streaming Approach

In the past, managing IT infrastructure was a hard job as it had to be managed manually, but now, through IaC (infrastructure as code), this can be handled very easily using config files. The two most popular infrastructure as code software tools are Terraform and Ansible, though different cloud vendors have different services for IaC. Let’s look at the example of the CloudFormation template which helps to implement the Kafka-K8s approach by using EKS and MSK services in AWS. A step-by-step guide on the basis of this is shown in the diagram:

Kafka and K8 diagram

Figure 2: Architecture of Kafka + K8s in AWS

Step One

Create an EKS cluster with the help of the CloudFormation template defined either in JSON or YAML. The following config templates can be used to create an Amazon EKS cluster named Demo.

YAML template (on the basis of Figure 2):

EKSCluster:
    Type: AWS::EKS::Cluster
    Properties:
      Name: Demo
      Version: "1.20"
      RoleArn: " arn:aws:iam::012345678910:role/eks-service-role-XXXX "
      ResourcesVpcConfig:
        SecurityGroupIds:
          - sg-xxxx
        SubnetIds:
          - Public Subnet 1 – 10.0.0.024
          - Public Subnet 2 – 10.0.1.024
          - Public Subnet 3 – 10.0.2.024
        EndpointPublicAccess: false
        EndpointPrivateAccess: true

    PublicAccessCidrs: [ "x.x.x.x/xx"]
      Logging:
        ClusterLogging:
          EnabledTypes:
            - Type: api
            - Type: audit
      Tags:
        - Key: "key"
          Value: "val"

Step Two

After the creation of the EKS cluster, pods need to be deployed through CI/CD pipeline using k8.yml and ConfigMap.yml files. The following samples of the configuration files create an application pod in the Demo EKS cluster.

configmap.yml

kind: ConfigMap
apiVersion: v1
metadata:
  name: SAMPLE_MAP_CONFIG
  namespace: SAMPLE_NAMESPACE
data:
  CONFIG_FILE: SAMPLE_APP_CONFIG 

k8.yml

kind: Deployment
apiVersion: apps/v1beta2
metadata:
  name: SAMPLE_METADATA
  namespace: SAMPLE_NAMESPACE
  labels:
    app: SAMPLE_LABEL
spec:
  replicas: <no. of replicas of pod>
  selector:
    matchLabels:
      app: SAMPLE_LABEL
  template:
    metadata:
      labels:
        app: SAMPLE_LABEL
    spec:
      containers:
      - name: SAMPLE_CONTAINER
        image: SAMPLE_IMAGE
        imagePullPolicy: Always
        ports:
        - containerPort: 8080
          protocol: TCP
        env:
          - name: SAMPLE_ENV1
            valueFrom:
             secretKeyRef:
              name: SAMPLE_SECRET_KEY1
              key: SAMPLE_KEY1
        envFrom:
        - configMapRef:
            name: SAMPLE_MAP_CONFIG
        volumeMounts:
        - name: SAMPLE_VOLUME
          mountPath: SAMPLE_MOUNT_PATH
          subPath: SAMPLE_APP_CONFIG
      volumes:
      - name: SAMPLE_VOLUME
        secret:
         secretName: SAMPLE_SECRET1
         items:
         - key: SAMPLE_KEY1
           path: SAMPLE_PATH1
      nodeSelector:
        TNTRole: luxkube

Step Three

The next step is to set up a Kafka cluster by using MSK and a template on the basis of Figure 2. It is as follows:

{
    "Description": "MSK Cluster with all properties",
    "Resources": {
        "TestCluster": {
            "Type": "AWS::MSK::Cluster",
            "Properties": {
                "ClusterName": "SAMPLE_KAFKA_CLUSTER_NAME",
                "KafkaVersion": "SAMPLE_VERSION",
                "NumberOfBrokerNodes": “SAMPLE_NUMBER_OF_BROKER”,
                "EnhancedMonitoring": "PER_BROKER",
                "EncryptionInfo": {
                    "EncryptionAtRest": {
                        "DataVolumeKMSKeyId": "SAMPLE_MASTER_KEY"
                    },
                    "EncryptionInTransit": {
                        "ClientBroker": "SAMPLE_BROKER", [Ex. TLS]
                        "InCluster": true
                    }
                },
                "OpenMonitoring": {
                    "Prometheus": {
                        "JmxExporter": {
                            "EnabledInBroker": "true"
                        }
                        "NodeExporter": {
                            "EnabledInBroker": "true"
                        }
                    }
                },
                "ConfigurationInfo": {
                    "Arn": "<Configuration ARN>",
                    "Revision": 1
                },
                "ClientAuthentication": {
                    # For TLS 
                    "Tls": {
                        "CertificateAuthorityArnList": [
                            "ARN"
                        ]
                    }
                },
                "Tags": {
                    "Environment": "SAMPLE_ENVIRONMENT_NAME",
                    "Owner": "SAMPLE_OWNER"
                },
                "BrokerNodeGroupInfo": {
                    "BrokerAZDistribution": "DEFAULT",
                    "InstanceType": "kafka.m5.large",
                    "SecurityGroups": [
                        "ReplaceWithSecurityGroupId"
                    ],
                    "StorageInfo": {
                        "EBSStorageInfo": {
                            "VolumeSize": <data volume size> 
                        }
                    },
                    "ClientSubnets": [
                        "Subnet1-11.0.3.0/24",
                        "Subnet2-11.0.4.0/24",
                        "Subnet3-11.0.5.0/24"
                    ]
                }
            }
        }
  }
}

Step Four

The next step is to create as many partitions in the Kafka topic as the replication factor of the EKS pod by using the following command:

Shell
$ bin/kafka-topics.sh --create –zookeeper <zookeeper connection string> 
--partitions <no. of partition> --replication-factor <no. of replicas> 
--topic <topic name> 

For example, if the replication factor of the pod in EKS cluster is three, then in the above command, the number of partitions will be three. It ensures absolute parallel processing, as there will be 1:1 mapping between the partition of the topic and the number of replicas of the pod. 

Conclusion

This Kafka-Kubernetes combination ensures all the benefits of parallel processing and cluster computing, and it becomes more effective when it merges with cloud computing. The speed layer of the Lambda Architecture is entirely based on stream computing, whereas in Kappa Architecture, the stream-based transformation component is the only processing layer. So, in both cases, this Kafka-Kubernetes combination can be used, and it also adds the benefits of the cloud when deployed in any cloud vendors like AWS, Azure, GCP, etc.


About Joyk


Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK