command center: Regular expressions in lexing and parsing
source link: https://commandcenter.blogspot.com/2011/08/regular-expressions-in-lexing-and.html
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.
Regular expressions in lexing and parsing
Comments extracted from a code review. I've been asked to disseminate them more widely.
I should say something about regular expressions in lexing and parsing. Regular expressions are hard to write, hard to write well, and can be expensive relative to other technologies. (Even when they are implemented correctly in N*M time, they have significant overheads, especially if they must capture the output.)
Lexers, on the other hand, are fairly easy to write correctly (if not
as compactly), and very easy to test. Consider finding alphanumeric
identifiers. It's not too hard to write the regexp (something like
"[a-ZA-Z_][a-ZA-Z_0-9]*"), but really not much harder to write as a
simple loop. The performance of the loop, though, will be much higher
and will involve much less code under the covers. A regular expression
library is a big thing. Using one to parse identifiers is like using a
Mack truck to go to the store for milk. And when we want to adjust our lexer to admit other character types,
such as Unicode identifiers, and handle normalization, and so on, the
hand-written loop can cope easily but the regexp approach will break
down.
A similar argument applies to parsing. Using regular expressions to
explore the parse state to find the way forward is expensive,
overkill, and error-prone. Standard lexing and parsing techniques are
so easy to write, so general, and so adaptable there's no reason to
use regular expressions. They also result in much faster, safer, and
compact implementations.
Another way to look at it is that lexers and parsing are matching
statically-defined patterns, but regular expressions' strength is that
they provide a way to express patterns dynamically. They're great in
text editors and search tools, but when you know at compile time what
all the things are you're looking for, regular expressions bring far
more generality and flexibility than you need.
Finally, on the point about writing well. Regular expressions are, in
my experience, widely misunderstood and abused. When I do code reviews
involving regular expressions, I fix up a far higher fraction of the
regular expressions in the code than I do regular statements. This is
a sign of misuse: most programmers (no finger pointing here, just
observing a generality) simply don't know what they are or how to use
them correctly.
Encouraging regular expressions as a panacea for all text processing
problems is not only lazy and poor engineering, it also reinforces
their use by people who shouldn't be using them at all.
So don't write lexers and parsers with regular expressions as the
starting point. Your code will be faster, cleaner, and much easier to
understand and to maintain.
Recommend
About Joyk
Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK