Technically the license is owned by the publisher of the paper on which the code...
source link: https://twitter.com/IanCutress/status/1404560693496582144
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.
Tweet
Conversation
3DPM Peak AVX test
8-core RKL
4.6 GHz AVX512
290 W
32845 pts
64-core Zen2
3.0 GHz AVX2
280 W
28761 pts
Let's be honest: no source, student project, patched by Intel, and very surprising results. It requires a bit more transparency.
You have gotten us used to better journalistic standards than that.
No source: No problem. Most benchmarks are not open source.
Student Project: What's that got to do about anything?
Patched by Intel: OK'ed by AMD.
Very surprising results: Not at all.
But you do you. I've spoken about this test at length. Not going to repeat just for you.
What's stopping you from open-sourcing it? Seriously?
It's your student project. Less credibility than a big name benchmark. Getting >5x speed up when using AVX512 compared to AVX2 is not expected just from doubling the register size. Something else is at play here
Technically the license is owned by the publisher of the paper on which the code is based. My student project was 10 years ago. Regardless, many benchmarks are closed.
Also, again, I've explained reasons why AVX2 to avx512 speedup is greater than expected. Go find them.
| Erdลs-Bacon-Sabbath of 13Trending now
Recommend
About Joyk
Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK