4

The QUIC Transport Protocol | Proceedings of the Conference of the ACM Special I...

 3 years ago
source link: https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3098822.3098842
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.
neoserver,ios ssh client
Proceedings of the Conference of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication

Recommended

The following publications are recommended due to their content which seems relevant to the context of this publication. They were selected using collaborative filtering and automatic topic modelling techniques and algorithms.

  • Multipath QUIC: Design and Evaluation

    Quick UDP Internet Connection (QUIC) is a recent protocol initiated by Google that combines the functions of HTTP/2, TLS, and TCP directly over UDP, with the goal to reduce the latency of client-server communication. It can replace the traditional HTTP/...

  • Bulk Multicast Transport Protocol

    BMTP offers rate controlled multicast with reliability, high throughput, and support for large numbers of receivers. A multicast sender needs feedback from receivers to recover from errors and to choose an appropriate send rate, but must avoid being ...

ABSTRACT

We present our experience with QUIC, an encrypted, multiplexed, and low-latency transport protocol designed from the ground up to improve transport performance for HTTPS traffic and to enable rapid deployment and continued evolution of transport mechanisms. QUIC has been globally deployed at Google on thousands of servers and is used to serve traffic to a range of clients including a widely-used web browser (Chrome) and a popular mobile video streaming app (YouTube). We estimate that 7% of Internet traffic is now QUIC. We describe our motivations for developing a new transport, the principles that guided our design, the Internet-scale process that we used to perform iterative experiments on QUIC, performance improvements seen by our various services, and our experience deploying QUIC globally. We also share lessons about transport design and the Internet ecosystem that we learned from our deployment.

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Chromium QUIC Implementation. https://cs.chromium.org/chromium/src/net/quic/.
  2. IETF QUIC working group. https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/quic/.
  3. SPDY: An experimental protocol for a faster web. https://www.chromium.org/spdy/spdy-whitepaper.
  4. The WebRTC Project. https://webrtc.org.
  5. A. Barth. 2015. RFC 6454: The Web Origin Concept. Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) (Dec. 2015).
  6. I. Arapakis, X. Bai, and B. Cambazoglu. 2014. Impact of Response Latency on User Behavior in Web Search. In ACM SIGIR.
  7. H. Balakrishnan, H. Rahul, and S. Seshan. 1999. An integrated congestion management architecture for Internet hosts. ACM SIGCOMM (1999).
  8. M. Belshe, R. Peon, and M. Thomson. 2015. RFC 7540: Hypertext Transfer Protocol Version 2 (HTTP/2). Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) (2015).
  9. M. Bishop. 2017. Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) over QUIC. IETF Internet Draft, draft-ietf-quic-http (2017).
  10. N. Cardwell, Y. Cheng, C. S. Gunn, V. Jacobson, and S. Yeganeh. 2016. BBR: Congestion-Based Congestion Control. In ACM Queue.
  11. Y. Cheng, J. Chu, S. Radhakrishnan, and A. Jain. 2016. RFC 7413: TCP Fast Open. Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) (2016).
  12. D. Clark and D. Tennenhouse. 1990. Architectural Considerations For a New Generation of Protocols. In ACM SIGCOMM.
  13. D. Clark, J. Wroclawski, K. Sollins, and R. Braden. 2005. Tussle in cyberspace: defining tomorrow's internet. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (ToN) (2005).
  14. J. Crowcroft and P. Oechslin. 1998. Differentiated End-to-end Internet Services Using a Weighted Proportional Fair Sharing TCP. SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review (1998).
  15. J. Dean and L. Barroso. 2013. The Tail at Scale. Commun. ACM (2013).
  16. M. Dong, Q. Li, D. Zarchy, B. Godfrey, and M. Schapira. 2015. PCC: Re-architecting Congestion Control for Consistent High Performance. In USENIX NSDI.
  17. N. Dukkipati, N. Cardwell, Y. Cheng, and M. Mathis. 2013. Tail Loss Probe (TLP): An Algorithm for Fast Recovery of Tail Losses. (2013).
  18. E. Dumazet. 2015. tcp_cubic better follow cubic curve after idle period. (2015). https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/30927520dbae297182990bb21d08762bcc35ce1d.
  19. R. Fielding and J. Reschke. 2014. RFC 7230: Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing. Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) (2014).
  20. M. Fischlin and F. Günther. 2014. Multi-Stage Key Exchange and the Case of Google's QUIC Protocol. In ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS).
  21. T. Flach, N. Dukkipati, A. Terzis, B. Raghavan, N. Cardwell, Y. Cheng, A. Jain, S. Hao, E. Katz-Bassett, and R. Govindan. 2013. Reducing Web Latency: The Virtue of Gentle Aggression. ACM SIGCOMM (2013).
  22. T. Flach, P. Papageorge, A. Terzis, L. Pedrosa, Y. Cheng, T. Karim, E. Katz-Bassett, and R. Govindan. 2016. An Internet-wide Analysis of Traffic Policing. In ACM SIGCOMM.
  23. B. Ford. 2007. Structured Streams: A New Transport Abstraction. In ACM SIGCOMM.
  24. G. Linden. 2006. Make Data Useful. http://sites.google.com/site/glinden/Home/StanfordDataMining.2006-11-28.ppt.
  25. I. Grigorik. 2013. Speed, Performance, and Human Perception. (2013). https://hpbn.co/primer-on-web-performance.
  26. S. Ha, I. Rhee, and L. Xu. 2008. CUBIC: A New TCP-friendly High-Speed TCP Variant. ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review (2008).
  27. S. Hätönen, A. Nyrhinen, L. Eggert, S. Strowes, P. Sarolahti, and M. Kojo. 2010. An Experimental Study of Home Gateway Characteristics. In ACM IMC.
  28. M. Honda, F. Huici, C. Raiciu, J. Araújo, and L. Rizzo. 2014. Rekindling network protocol innovation with user-level stacks. ACM Computer Communication Review (2014).
  29. M. Honda, Y. Nishida, C. Raiciu, A. Greenhalgh, M. Handley, and H. Tokuda. 2011. Is It Still Possible to Extend TCP?. In ACM IMC.
  30. J. Iyengar. 2015. Cubic Quiescence: Not So Inactive. (2015). Presentation at IETF94, https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/94/slides/slides-94-tcpm-8.pdf.
  31. J. Iyengar, P. Amer, and R. Stewart. 2006. Concurrent Multipath Transfer Using SCTP Multihoming Over Independent End-to-End Paths. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (ToN) (2006).
  32. J. Iyengar, S. Cheshire, and J. Greassley. 2013. Minion: Service Model and Conceptual API. IETF Internet Draft, draft-iyengar-minion-concept-02 (2013).
  33. J. Iyengar and I. Swett. 2016. QUIC Loss Detection and Congestion Control. IETF Internet Draft, draft-ietf-quic-recovery (2016).
  34. J. Iyengar and M. Thomson. 2016. QUIC: A UDP-Based Multiplexed and Secure Transport. IETF Internet Draft, draft-ietf-quic-transport (2016).
  35. S. Iyengar and K. Nekritz. 2017. Building Zero protocol for fast, secure mobile connections. (2017). Facebook Post, https://code.facebook.com/posts/608854979307125/building-zero-protocol-for-fast-secure-mobile-connections/.
  36. J. Brutlag. 2009. Speed Matters. https://research.googleblog.com/2009/06/speed-matters.html.
  37. V. Jacobson, R. Braden, and D. Borman. 1992. RFC 1323: TCP extensions for high performance. Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) (1992).
  38. T. Jager, J. Schwenk, and J. Somorovsky. 2015. On the Security of TLS 1.3 and QUIC Against Weaknesses in PKCS#1 V1.5 Encryption. In ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS).
  39. P. Karn and C. Partridge. 1987. Improving Round-Trip Time Estimates in Reliable Transport Protocols. In ACM SIGCOMM.
  40. E. Kohler, M. Handley, and S. Floyd. 2006. Designing DCCP: Congestion Control Without Reliability. In ACM SIGCOMM.
  41. M. Kühlewind, S. Neuner, and B. Trammell. 2013. On the State of ECN and TCP Options on the Internet. In Passive and Active Measurement Conference (PAM).
  42. A. Langley. 2015. QUIC and TLS. (2015). Presentation at IETF92, https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/92/slides/slides-92-saag-5.pdf.
  43. A. Langley and W. Chang. QUIC Crypto. http://goo.gl/OuVSxa.
  44. R. Lychev, S. Jero, A. Boldyreva, and C. Nita-Rotaru. 2015. How Secure and Quick is QUIC? Provable Security and Performance Analyses. In IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy.
  45. M. Mathis and J. Heffner. 2007. RFC 4821: Packetization layer path MTU discovery. Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) (2007).
  46. M. Mathis, J. Mahdavi, S. Floyd, and A. Romanow. 1996. RFC 2018: TCP Selective Acknowledgment Options. Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) (1996).
  47. O. Mehani, R. Holz, S. Ferlin, and R. Boreli. 2015. An early look at multipath TCP deployment in the wild. In ACM HotPlanet.
  48. M. Nottingham, P. McManus, and J. Reschke. 2016. RFC 7838: HTTP Alternative Services. Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) (2016).
  49. M. Nowlan, N. Tiwari, J. Iyengar, S. Amin, and B. Ford. 2012. Fitting Square Pegs Through Round Pipes: Unordered Delivery Wire-Compatible with TCP and TLS. In USENIX NSDI.
  50. C. Paasch. 2016. Network Support for TCP Fast Open. (2016). Presentation at NANOG 67, https://www.nanog.org/sites/default/files/Paasch_Network_Support.pdf.
  51. W Michael Petullo, Xu Zhang, Jon A Solworth, Daniel J Bernstein, and Tanja Lange. 2013. MinimaLT: Minimal-Latency Networking Through Better Security. In ACM CCS.
  52. L. Popa, A. Ghodsi, and I. Stoica. 2010. HTTP as the Narrow Waist of the Future Internet. In ACM HotNets.
  53. S. Radhakrishnan, Y. Cheng, J. Chu, A. Jain, and B. Raghavan. 2011. TCP Fast Open. In ACM CoNEXT.
  54. C. Raiciu, C. Paasch, S. Barre, A. Ford, M. Honda, F. Duchene, O. Bonaventure, and M. Handley. 2012. How Hard Can It Be? Designing and Implementing a Deployable Multipath TCP. In USENIX NSDI.
  55. E. Rescorla. 2017. The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3. IETF Internet Draft, draft-ietf-tls-tls13 (2017).
  56. E. Rescorla and N. Modadugu. 2012. RFC 6347: Datagram Transport Layer Security Version 1.2. Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) (2012).
  57. L. Rizzo. 2012. Netmap: a novel framework for fast packet I/O. In 21st USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 12).
  58. J. Rosenberg. 2008. UDP and TCP as the New Waist of the Internet Hourglass. IETF Internet Draft, draft-rosenberg-internet-waist-hourglass-00 (2008).
  59. J. Roskind. 2012. QUIC: Design Document and Specification Rationale. (2012). https://goo.gl/eCYF1a.
  60. J. Salowey, H. Zhou, P. Eronen, and H. Tschofenig. 2008. RFC 5077: Transport Layer Security (TLS) Session Resumption without Server-Side State. Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) (2008).
  61. Sandvine. 2016. Global Internet Phenomena Report. (2016).
  62. R. Stewart. 2007. RFC 4960: Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP). Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) (2007).
  63. M. Thomson and S. Turner. 2017. Using Transport Layer Security (TLS) to Secure QUIC. IETF Internet Draft, draft-ietf-quic-tls (2017).
  64. L. Zhang. 1986. Why TCP Timers Don't Work Well. In ACM SIGCOMM.

Comments

About Cookies On This Site

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

Learn more

Got it!

report

Recommend

About Joyk


Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK