stabilize const_int_pow by tspiteri · Pull Request #76829 · rust-lang/rust · Git...
source link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/76829
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.
Collaborator
rust-highfive commented on Sep 17
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)
This PR stabilized const for the following public methods:
{i*,u*}::checked_pow
{i*,u*}::saturating_pow
{i*,u*}::wrapping_pow
{i*,u*}::overflowing_pow
{i*,u*}::pow
u*::next_power_of_two
u*::checked_next_power_of_two
u*::wrapping_next_power_of_two
(the method itself is still unstable)
Member
Mark-Simulacrum commented on Sep 19
r? @KodrAus to kick off libs FCP here, diff in PR looks good from an impl perspective
The latest upstream changes (presumably #76327) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.
Note that reviewers usually do not review pull requests until merge conflicts are resolved! Once you resolve the conflicts, you should change the labels applied by bors to indicate that your PR is ready for review. Post this as a comment to change the labels:
@rustbot modify labels: +S-waiting-on-review -S-waiting-on-author
The latest upstream changes (presumably #76850) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.
Note that reviewers usually do not review pull requests until merge conflicts are resolved! Once you resolve the conflicts, you should change the labels applied by bors to indicate that your PR is ready for review. Post this as a comment to change the labels:
@rustbot modify labels: +S-waiting-on-review -S-waiting-on-author
Team member @KodrAus has proposed to merge this. The next step is review by the rest of the tagged team members:
No concerns currently listed.
Once a majority of reviewers approve (and at most 2 approvals are outstanding), this will enter its final comment period. If you spot a major issue that hasn't been raised at any point in this process, please speak up!
See this document for info about what commands tagged team members can give me.
This is now entering its final comment period, as per the review above.
The latest upstream changes (presumably #79167) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.
Note that reviewers usually do not review pull requests until merge conflicts are resolved! Once you resolve the conflicts, you should change the labels applied by bors to indicate that your PR is ready for review. Post this as a comment to change the labels:
@rustbot modify labels: +S-waiting-on-review -S-waiting-on-author
Contributor
Author
tspiteri commented 27 days ago
Done.
Contributor
oli-obk commented 27 days ago
@bors r+
Contributor
bors commented 27 days ago
Commit a6bcf7a has been approved by oli-obk
Contributor
bors commented 27 days ago
Contributor
bors commented 27 days ago
Test failed - checks-actions
Contributor
oli-obk commented 27 days ago
@bors retry gzip failures in CI
Recommend
About Joyk
Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK