12

What’s the deal with OLDNAMES.LIB?

 4 years ago
source link: https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20200730-00/?p=104021
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.
neoserver,ios ssh client

Set the time machine to 1988. The C language has not yet been standardized. Everybody had their own libraries for doing stuff, and some of them even pretended to be compatible with each other. The Microsoft C compiler, for example, came with a bunch of functions like unlink and stat to provide sort-of compatibility with Unix-sort-of source code.

And then the C standard was ratified in 1989. Now things got interesting, because those functions were not part of the C standard. Standard-conforming C programs were welcome to define functions with those names, and the rules say that this is perfectly legal and are not references to the identically-named Unix-like functions.

Now, there was a lot of code written for the Microsoft C toolchain that used these sort-of-Unix-ish functions, and renaming those functions would cause those programs to break.

So should we rename the Unix-ish functions in the Microsoft C library, in order to conform to the C standard? Or should we leave the functions in the Microsoft C library under their pre-standard names, to keep existing code working?

Let’s do both !

The Microsoft C library renamed these Unix-ish function to have a leading underscore. So unlink became _unlink , and so on. A program that didn’t use the Unix-ish library functions could define its own function called unlink , and everything would work just fine. But if the program actually wanted to use the unlink function from the Unix-ish library, this magic library OLDNAMES.LIB would step in.

The OLDNAMES.LIB library doesn’t contain any code of its own. Rather, it contains name redirections that say, “Hey, I have a symbol called unlink , in case you were looking for it. Wait, you want to know what this symbol represents? Um, it represents a symbol named _unlink . Good luck with that.”

If the linker cannot find a symbol named unlink , it turns to OLDNAMES.LIB as a library of last resort, and that library resolves the symbol unlink , but replaces it with an unresolved symbol named _unlink . The linker then goes through the symbol resolution process again, and this time it finds _unlink in the regular C library.

The net result is that your attempt to call the function unlink got redirected to the function _unlink , but only if you didn’t already have a function named unlink .

You can suppress the OLDNAMES.LIB library in various ways, most notably by passing the /NODEFAULTLIB flag, which can be abbreviated to the somewhat enigmatic /NOD .


About Joyk


Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK