16

The Pixel 4 is more like an iPhone than any other Android phone - The Verge

 4 years ago
source link: https://www.theverge.com/platform/amp/2019/10/22/20926474/google-pixel-4-iphone-comparison-switch-gestures-navigation-apps-animations
Go to the source link to view the article. You can view the picture content, updated content and better typesetting reading experience. If the link is broken, please click the button below to view the snapshot at that time.
neoserver,ios ssh client

The Pixel 4 is more like an iPhone than any other Android phone

Google is bridging the gap between iOS and Android

I’ve never been a big fan of Android, and each time I try to switch from my iPhone, I’m left frustrated. Every Android phone I pick up has a different user interface, with clumsy navigation, substandard animations, and an overall lack of polish. While the Galaxy Note 10 I’ve been testing recently does a slightly better job at some UI elements, its fingerprint reader, bloatware, and forced Bixby integration still left me wanting more. I’ve now been using Google’s Pixel 4 for nearly a week, and it’s given me hope that Android is heading in the right direction.

Google has done a number of things with the Pixel 4 to appeal to iPhone users like myself. The basic navigation mechanic has switched to gestures by default as part of Android 10. It’s almost identical to the gestures that Apple borrowed from webOS to bring to the iPhone X two years ago. You swipe up on a tiny white bar to go home and swipe across it to quickly switch apps. There’s even a task switcher UI if you swipe up and hold.

Alongside these new gestures, Google has also introduced its own version of Face ID. During my testing, I’ve found it to be incredibly reliable and fast. It actually works better than Face ID by automatically bypassing the lock screen to get you straight into your phone without you ever having to touch the display. There’s even a screen attention feature (that you have to enable) that stops the display from going to sleep if you’re looking at it.

Google’s Face Unlock feature feels far better integrated into Android than any other face scanning feature I’ve found on other Android handsets. It works with Google Pay, websites, and even third-party apps like 1Password. There might only be a handful of apps supported, but it’s far more seamless than the many finicky fingerprint readers I’ve had to battle with previously. Much like Face ID, it just works.

Google’s built-in core Android apps are also far superior to what Apple supplies with iOS. Google Photos smartly arranges my photos, Chrome syncs with all of the browsing I do on my desktop PC, Google Maps actually gets me to Victoria in London and not Victoria in Australia, and I don’t really need to say anything about the state of the built-in Mail client in iOS 13.

All of these improvements have given me hope that I could switch to Android fully soon, but there’s also a large number of annoyances that still give me doubt. The new navigation system works well in a lot of apps, but there are many that clearly aren’t ready for it. I use Slack daily, and tapping into a conversation thread with co-workers and swiping back works well. But as soon as I attempt to swipe over to get the navigation bar (as I would on iOS), it immediately backs me out of the app.

Google has implemented the swipe right gesture as a universal back button, but apps like Gmail used to use these edge gestures to open a slide-out menu. I’ve been confused by this a number of times over the past week, and it’s a really frustrating experience, especially if you’re used to the gestures in iOS.

Apple hasn’t exactly solved this problem of navigation back to an app either; in iOS, this ugly text appears at the top left of an app to help you navigate back. It’s not ideal, but I prefer it to swiping across and exiting the app instead of getting a sidebar. Swiping within apps using gestures genuinely saves me time when navigating around apps, and I’d like to see this used in Android.

There’s also a level of inconsistency across Android in many parts that still makes it feel less polished than iOS. I can navigate to the Photos app on Android and tap a picture and then swipe down to dismiss it, but if I take a photo from the camera and look at a preview of the picture, then swiping down does nothing. The navigation buttons in a lot of apps like the Play Store, Phone, and Camera are placed at the bottom of the screen for easy access. In Chrome, they’re placed at the top on Android, but even Chrome on iOS places these closer to your thumbs at the bottom of the display. Some have hamburger menus and navigation buttons, and it’s almost like the teams at Google don’t talk to each other or agree on a single unified effort here.

Elsewhere, it’s really the small things that still put me off of Android, and you could probably ridicule me for even noticing them. When I swipe to the bottom of the page in Chrome, it just stops abruptly. There’s no subtle bounce animation or anything to indicate I may have reached the end of the page. In Twitter for Android, I pull down to refresh, and there’s no rubberband effect or anything resembling a decent animation, just a boring loading circle.

Both of these are strange omissions considering that I can do the same in the main app launcher on Android 10 and there’s a subtle bounce. There are plenty of examples of this inconsistency across Android, and I won’t list them all, but it leaves you feeling like you’re missing something if you’re used to the smooth animations found in iOS.

There’s also a lack of clever haptics across Android. On my iPhone, I can pull to refresh in apps like Outlook, and there’s a subtle vibration that lets me know the phone is searching for new mail. Android has this when you hold down to select pictures in the Photos app or swipe down to get to notifications, but it’s not widely implemented across apps.

Some of this inconsistency comes from app developers, and it often feels like there’s a lack of polish and love given to Android apps compared to their iOS counterparts. Even Twitter still only has the basic dark mode, not the totally black “lights out” mode that’s available on iOS. Apps like WhatsApp feel totally different on iOS, as they’re obviously trying to conform to some Android norms that are outdated in this modern Android 10 era.

I’d love to see Google focus on all of these parts of the user experience. There’s clearly an effort to match what’s available with the iPhone. But if you’re going to overhaul the entire way you navigate around a touchscreen OS, then there needs to a bigger, more coordinated effort with developers.

That effort also needs to extend to the hardware before I’d consider switching. The bezels on Pixel phones have always annoyed me, and the forehead on the Pixel 4 isn’t much better. Thankfully, the overall build quality has improved from previous years, and the new orange color really pops. Google took a step back with battery life on the Pixel 4, though, and that’s particularly unfortunate given the improvements on the iPhone 11 side.

I’d also like to see a good Android-compatible smartwatch before I consider switching. I use the Apple Watch paired to my iPhone, and there’s still no competitor I’d seriously consider. (The Galaxy Watch Active 2 is close, but to have the best experience with that, you really need to be using a Samsung phone.) Since you can’t use the Apple Watch with Android, I feel a little locked into Apple’s ecosystem here. I also use AirPods, which is fortunate as there aren’t any headphones or dongles supplied with the Pixel 4.

Despite all of the challenges Google faces here, I’ve really enjoyed using the Pixel 4 over the past week. It’s the first time I’ve genuinely considered switching to Android for a longer period than just a week or two. As a Windows user, I really want to switch to Android because Microsoft is increasingly focused on making Android and Windows work well together. Your Phone brings the type of integration between Windows and Android that Apple offers between iOS and macOS. Google is definitely bridging the gap between Android and iOS, and I’m going to keep checking back in to see if it closes even further before I make the big jump.

Vox Media has affiliate partnerships. These do not influence editorial content, though Vox Media may earn commissions for products purchased via affiliate links. For more information, see our ethics policy.

Science

Rocket Lab’s 13th launch ends in failure, after rocket experiences problem mid-flight

Policy

DuckDuckGo reinstated in India after being unreachable since July 1st

Apple

Reddit says it’s fixing code in its iOS app that copied clipboard contents

View all stories in Tech

Comments

The hamburger menu is supposed to slide out if you hold your finger on the left edge of the phone for a second – when you see the menu peek out, pulling toward the centre will pull it into view rather than swiping as a back gesture. It’s not 100% effective on my Pixel 2 though.

Lights Out on Twitter is starting to roll out.

By GambaKufu on 10.22.19 10:42am

Yeah I tried it a few times and it really doesn’t work well. It’s poorly implemented.

By Tom Warren on 10.22.19 10:48am

Google in a nutshell lately. And this is coming from a Google-everything user.

By ProductFRED on 10.22.19 10:52am

Swiping in a diagonal up or down from the side works 100% of the time to bring out the menu for me, it’s definitely something I still have to think about but it always works. The peek was always hit or miss for me.

By Ragin on 10.22.19 10:48am

You can also just swipe with two fingers. One finger swipe to go back, two finger swipe to open a menu – it works for me every time. I hadn’t heard about this whole 45 degree thing before – I assumed this was just how it worked!

By Richard Hodson on 10.22.19 1:19pm

The 45° swipe has always worked better for me than this.

By brnpttmn on 10.22.19 10:50am

Google has implemented the swipe right gesture as a universal back button, but apps like Gmail used to use these edge gestures to open a slide-out menu. I’ve been confused by this a number of times over the past week, and it’s a really frustrating experience, especially if you’re used to the gestures in iOS.

Quick tip.Swipe at a 45° angle (up or down) from the side and it will open the slide out menu rather than activating the back function. Works great.

By brnpttmn on 10.22.19 10:46am

And it’s not just 45°, it’s at least 45°. What’s happening is that the back gesture is only recognized at less than 45°, so the app handles it when it is greater than that.

By mattcoz on 10.22.19 11:15am

Google’s Face Unlock feature feels far better integrated into Android than any other face scanning feature I’ve found on other Android handsets. It works with Google Pay, websites, and even third-party apps like 1Password. There might only be a handful of apps supported, but it’s far more seamless than the many finicky fingerprint readers I’ve had to battle with previously. Much like Face ID, it just works.

Imagine saying that about Apple.
Who would let that slide on the iPhone 12? "There might only be a handful of apps supported".
This is and will remain the most painful failure of android. They can’t get any feature widely adopted in any decent stretch of time.

By Xaelias on 10.22.19 10:47am

I agree, and I think a lot of that comes down to developer love. Apple has loyal developers and the company provides them with the APIs and stage to make their apps shine. It’s really hard to earn that trust and love when Android is so varied and customizable. But that’s also why people like using Android, so it’s a difficult challenge.

By Tom Warren on 10.22.19 10:49am

It’s coming, it’s just late.

App updates released after November 1 2019 must target Android 9, which was the version release where Google updated the biometric API from fingerprint to the new one. Any app that wants to support fingerprint unlock that’s still maintained will work with the face unlock with the next update after that.

By GambaKufu on 10.22.19 10:52am

Which, given how often these apps are updated, could be MONTHS. That’s one thing Apple got right; FaceID worked out of the box with any app that used TouchID. It was a seamless transition. Google’s version, not so much.

By FriendlyNeighborhoodPoolman on 10.22.19 11:19am

Apple is vertically integrated, they can prep for this much easier. There are pros and cons to both – Android doesn’t need a full system update to patch a browser bug, for example.

By GambaKufu on 10.22.19 3:58pm

I can’t stand this on iOS – just have an updatable Safari App, Apple!! (granted I use Chrome most of the time anyways)

By aSquard on 10.23.19 10:41am

Imagine saying "I want to choose my default apps", "I want access to a filesystem", "I want Siri to work in third-party apps".

By confor on 10.22.19 11:03am

1/ Yeah I still don’t get that one
2/ I actually don’t mind the way they handle this on iOS for the most part
3/ Siri is not great though

By Xaelias on 10.22.19 11:04am

Imagine either buying an expensive Android phone that’ll stop receiving updates in two years or buying lots and lots of ‘pretty good’ budget devices instead of just buying a phone that’ll still run current software after 3+ years.

iOS 13 filesystem (or the Document5 app, if you need a little more filesystem) says hi. The other two things are minor annoyances I’ll gladly deal with.

By wawman on 10.22.19 12:11pm

Imagine either buying an expensive Android phone that’ll stop receiving updates in two years

Not a problem for most Americans if not most people, and America is where iPhone is the most popular. Android phones are just not as expensive (both ends).

By omo on 10.22.19 12:22pm

No, it is still a problem if you make a flagship phone and stop updating it after 2-3 years that’s weak. Phones cost too much to only get support for a contract / installment cycle.

By king loxx on 10.22.19 1:04pm

That’s funny about updates because every single non-tech person I know with an iPhone is scared of updating their phone. The reputation at this point is that Apple updates just slow down your device.

iOS 13 filesystem is an absolute joke. Wake me up when 2 apps can access the same folder.

By confor on 10.22.19 12:31pm

Um, wake up I guess?
I access the same folders from multiple apps. I don’t know maybe I misunderstood sorry

By Ry L on 11.02.19 12:34am

Imagine buying a phone where the company software throttles the battery life and slows the phone down.

By ardent on 10.22.19 1:53pm

If Google back when they took on Matias Duarte (webOS designer) had adopted so much of what made webOS great, Apple would be copying Google not the other way around.

Now if Google wants to attract more high end customers they are forced to copy iOS in many ways to even get their consideration much less convince them to make the switch.

If this trend of Android blatantly copying iOS continues then whatever uniqueness Android had will be lost (Please don’t remind me that you can install one of a million launchers available, 99% of Android buyers don’t know what a Launcher is much less how to modify it to their liking).

Both platforms working towards almost an identical future with design and features might have its benefits but then you have to ask what’s the point of both existing?

By jdmp10 on 10.22.19 11:04am

+1 I stopped messing with launchers something like 6y ago…

By Xaelias on 10.22.19 11:06am

Apple hasn’t exactly solved this problem of navigation back to an app either; in iOS, this ugly text appears at the top left of an app to help you navigate back.

I wouldn’t say the "previous app" button is ugly. Anyway, it is no longer necessary, as you can swipe on the bottom of the screen to quickly switch between apps

By Staszek on 10.22.19 11:10am

View All Comments

About Joyk


Aggregate valuable and interesting links.
Joyk means Joy of geeK